Article (Scientific journals)
Flutter Prediction from Flight Flutter Test Data
Dimitriadis, Grigorios; Cooper, Jonathan E
2001In Journal of Aircraft, 38 (2), p. 355-367
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
04 Journal of Aircraft 38(2),355-367,2001.pdf
Publisher postprint (423.94 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Flutter testing; Aeroelasticity
Abstract :
[en] The most common approach to flight flutter testing is to track estimated modal damping ratios of an aircraft over a number of flight conditions. These damping trends are then extrapolated to predict whether it is safe to move to the next test point and also to determine the utter speed. In the quest for more reliable and efficient flight flutter testing procedures, a number of alternative data analysis methods have been proposed. Five of these approaches are compared on two simulated aeroelastic models. The comparison is based on both the accuracy of prediction and the efficiency of each method. It is found that, for simple aeroelastic systems, the Nissim and Gilyard method (Nissim, E., and Gilyard, G. B., “Method for Experimental Determination of Flutter Speed by Parameter Identification,” AIAA Paper 89-1324, 1989) yields the best flutter predictions and is also the least computationally expensive approach.However, for larger systems, simpler approaches such as the damping fit and envelope function methods are found to be most reliable.
Disciplines :
Aerospace & aeronautics engineering
Author, co-author :
Dimitriadis, Grigorios ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Intéractions fluide structure et aérodynamique expérimentale
Cooper, Jonathan E;  University of Manchester > School of Engineering
Language :
English
Title :
Flutter Prediction from Flight Flutter Test Data
Publication date :
2001
Journal title :
Journal of Aircraft
ISSN :
0021-8669
eISSN :
1533-3868
Publisher :
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, United States
Volume :
38
Issue :
2
Pages :
355-367
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 27 March 2009

Statistics


Number of views
292 (11 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
4 (4 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
93
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
81
OpenCitations
 
69

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi