|Reference : Spatial aggregation of tropical trees at multiple spatial scales|
|Scientific journals : Article|
|Life sciences : Phytobiology (plant sciences, forestry, mycology...)|
Life sciences : Environmental sciences & ecology
|Spatial aggregation of tropical trees at multiple spatial scales|
|Réjou-Méchain, Maxime [ > > ]|
|Flores, Olivier [ > > ]|
|Bourland, Nils [Université de Liège - ULg > Forêts, Nature et Paysage > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels >]|
|Doucet, Jean-Louis [Université de Liège - ULg > Forêts, Nature et Paysage > Laboratoire de Foresterie des régions trop. et subtropicales >]|
|Fétéké, Fousséni Richard [ > > ]|
|Pasquier, Alexandra [ > > ]|
|Hardy, Olivier J. [ > > ]|
|Journal of Ecology|
|[en] Central Africa ; Determinants of plant community diversity and structure ; Dispersal limitation ; Distribution patterns ; Niche differentiation ; Species traits ; Tropical forest ; Variance partitioning|
|[en] 1. In tropical forests, species distribution patterns may be strongly context-dependent owing to
local stochasticity of recruitment and⁄ or to the speciﬁc history and environment of each site. Recent studies have reported, however, that the degree of spatial aggregation of tropical tree species is partly determined by some species traits irrespectively of site conditions, at least at a very local scale (<200 m).
2. Here, we used standardized large-scale forest inventories of ﬁve Central African tropical forests (9670 0.5-ha plots spread over 5550 km2) to quantify the spatial aggregation of 106 tropical tree species at larger spatial scales. For this purpose, we developed a new statistic to quantify the respective contributions of different spatial scales to the aggregation patterns, and we tested whether patterns were consistent across sites. We ﬁnally asked whether species characteristics related to dispersal ability, to response to disturbances and to biogeographical range could signiﬁcantly explain aggregation patterns.
3. Although aggregation patterns varied substantially among sites within each species, they
displayed inter-site consistencies (21–24%of the total variance explained by species identity) at the local scale (0.2–1 km) and at the mesoscale (1–10 km) but not at the landscape scale (>10 km). At the two former scales, upper taxonomical levels (family and⁄or order) signiﬁcantly explained variation in the degree of species aggregation, while at the landscape scale, aggregation was entirely contingent on the site considered. Few species characteristics, except dispersal syndromes and wood density, were able to signiﬁcantly explain aggregation patterns.
4. Synthesis. One of our most striking results is the high context dependence of species aggregation patterns, whatever the spatial scale considered. However, we showed that species distribution patterns can be predicted, to an extent, at spatial scales much larger than previously investigated in this context. Such patterns may be explained by traits displaying phylogenetic conservatism
|Researchers ; Professionals ; Students|
|File(s) associated to this reference|
All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.