Reference : New approaches and old controversies to postoperative pain control following cardiac ...
Scientific journals : Letter to the editor
Human health sciences : Anesthesia & intensive care
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/9569
New approaches and old controversies to postoperative pain control following cardiac surgery
English
Roediger, Laurence mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Anesthésie et réanimation >]
Larbuisson, Robert mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Anesthésie et réanimation >]
Lamy, Maurice mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département des sciences cliniques > Anesthésie et réanimation]
Jul-2006
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
Cambridge University Press
23
7
539-550
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
0265-0215
1365-2346
Cambridge
United Kingdom
[en] surgery cardiac ; pain acute and postoperative ; anaesthesia spinal ; anaesthesia extradural ; anaesthesia conduction ; anaesthetics local ; analgesics opioid ; analgesics nonsterioidal
[en] Objective: To evaluate the effect of postoperative pain control in cardiac surgical patients on morbidity, mortality and other outcome measures. Background: New approaches in pain control have been introduced over the past decade. The impact of these interventions, either alone or in combination, on perioperative outcome was evaluated in cardiac surgical patients. Methods: We searched Medline for the period of 1980 to the present using the key terms analgesics, opioid, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cardiac surgery, regional analgesia, spinal, epidural, fast-track cardiac anaesthesia, fast-track cardiac surgery, myocardial ischaemia, myocardial infarction, postoperative care, accelerated care programmes, postoperative complications, and we examined and discussed the articles that were identified to be included in this review. Results: Pain management in cardiac surgery is becoming more important with the establishment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fast-track management of conventional cardiac surgery patients. Advances have been made in this area and encompass specific techniques, such as central neuraxial blockade or selective nerve blocks, and drugs (opioids, sedative-hypnotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Ideally, these therapies provide not only patient comfort but also mitigate untoward cardiovascular responses, pulmonary responses, and other inflammatory and secondary sympathetic responses. The introduction of these newer approaches to perioperative care has reduced morbidity, but not mortality, in cardiac surgical patients. Conclusions: Understanding perioperative pathophysiology and implementation of care regimes to reduce the stress of cardiac surgery, will continue to accelerate rehabilitation associated with decreased hospitalization and increased satisfaction and safety after discharge. Reorganization of the perioperative team (anaesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses and physical therapists) will be essential to achieve successful fast-track cardiac surgical programmes. Developments and improvements of multimodal interventions within the context of 'fast-track' cardiac surgery programmes represents the major challenge for the medical professionals working to achieve a 'pain and risk free' perioperative course.
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/9569
10.1017/S0265021506000548

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Restricted access
449.pdfPublisher postprint1.32 MBRequest copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.