Article (Scientific journals)
Using test station and on-farm data for the genetic evaluation of Piétrain boars used on Landrace sows for growth performance
Dufrasne, Marie; Rustin, Maité; Jaspart, Véronique et al.
2011In Journal of Animal Science, 89, p. 3872-3880
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
3872.full.pdf
Author postprint (857.1 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
crossbred progeny; genetic parameters; growth potential; Piétrain boar; reliability; variance heterogeneity
Abstract :
[en] The aim of this study was to develop a new genetic evaluation model to estimate the genetic merit of boars for growth based on 1) performance of their crossbred progeny fattened in the test station and 2) their own performance or those of relatives from the on-farm testing system. The model was a bivariate random regression animal model with linear splines and was applied to Piétrain boars from the Walloon Region of Belgium mated with Landrace sows. Data contained 1) 12,610 BW records from the test station collected on 1,435 crossbred pigs from Piétrain boars and Landrace sows, and 2) 52,993 BW records from the on-farm testing system collected on 50,670 pigs with a breed composition of at least 40% Piétrain or Landrace. Since 2007, 56 Piétrain boars have been tested in the station. Data used to estimate variance components and breeding values were standardized for the age to take into account heterogeneity of variances and then pre-adjusted at 210 d of age to put all records on the same scale. Body weight records from the test station and from the on-farm testing system were considered as 2 different traits. The heterosis effect was modeled as fixed regression on the heterozygosity coefficient. As all test station animals were similarly crossbred, smaller variation in heterozygosity caused the sampling error of the regression estimate at 210 d to be larger in the test station than in on-farm data with estimates of 28.35 ± 14.55 kg and 9.02 ± 0.67 kg, respectively. Therefore, the most likely reason for the large differences in estimates was sampling. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.37 to 0.60 at 210 and 75 d, respectively, for test station BW and from 0.42 to 0.60 at 210 d and 175 d, respectively, for on-farm BW. Genetic correlation decreased when the age interval between records increased, and were greater between ages for test station than for on-farm data. Genetic correlations between test station and on-farm BW at the same age were high: 0.90 at 175 d and 0.85 at 210 d. For the 56 boars tested in the station, the average reliability of their EBV for ADG between 100 and 210 d was improved from 0.60 using only test station data to 0.69 using jointly test station and on-farm data. Based on these results, the new model developed was considered as a good method of detection of differences in growth potential of Piétrain boars based on test station and on-farm data.
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry
Genetics & genetic processes
Author, co-author :
Dufrasne, Marie ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Sciences agronomiques > Zootechnie
Rustin, Maité
Jaspart, Véronique;  Association Wallonne des Eleveurs de Porcs
Wavreille, José;  Centre Wallon de Recherches agronomiques > Production et Filières > Mode d'élevage, bein-être et qualité
Gengler, Nicolas  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Sciences agronomiques > Zootechnie
Language :
English
Title :
Using test station and on-farm data for the genetic evaluation of Piétrain boars used on Landrace sows for growth performance
Publication date :
2011
Journal title :
Journal of Animal Science
ISSN :
0021-8812
eISSN :
1525-3163
Publisher :
American Society of Animal Science, Champaign, United States - Illinois
Volume :
89
Pages :
3872-3880
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 29 June 2011

Statistics


Number of views
122 (37 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
12 (11 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
5
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
3
OpenCitations
 
5

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi