|Reference : Tax Evasion, Welfare Fraud, and ”The Broken Windows” Effect: An Experiment in Belgium...|
|Scientific congresses and symposiums : Unpublished conference|
|Business & economic sciences : Economic systems & public economics|
|Tax Evasion, Welfare Fraud, and ”The Broken Windows” Effect: An Experiment in Belgium, France and the Netherlands|
|Lefebvre, Mathieu [Université de Liège - ULg > HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'ULg : UER > Economie politique et finances publiques >]|
|Thematic meeting of the AFSE: Law and Economics|
|9 juin au 10 juin 2011|
|CRESE - University of Besançon|
|[en] Tax evasion, social fraud, social comparisons, cross-country comparisons, experiments|
|[en] In a series of experiments conducted in Belgium (Wallonia and Flanders), France and the
Netherlands, we compare behavior regarding tax evasion and welfare dodging, with and without
information about others’ behavior. Subjects have to decide between a ‘registered’ income, the
realization of which will be known to the tax authority for sure, and an ‘unregistered’ income that will only be known with some probability. This unregistered income comes from self-employment in the Tax treatment and from black labor supplementing some unemployment compensation in the Welfare treatment. Subjects have then to decide on whether reporting their income or not, knowing the risk of detection. The results show that (i) individuals evade more in the Welfare treatment than in the Tax treatment; (ii) many subjects choose an option that allows for tax evasion or welfare fraud but report their income honestly anyway; (iii) examples of low compliance tend to increase tax evasion while examples of high compliance exert no influence; (iv) tax evasion is more frequent in France and the Netherlands; Walloons evade taxes less than the Flemish. There is no cross-country difference in welfare dodging.
|File(s) associated to this reference|
All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.