Reference : Windelband on Beurteilung
Scientific congresses and symposiums : Paper published in a book
Arts & humanities : Philosophy & ethics
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/86956
Windelband on Beurteilung
English
[fr] La théorie du jugement de Windelband
Dewalque, Arnaud mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département de philosophie > Phénoménologies >]
Jan-2013
1e édition
Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic
[fr] Le Jugement et la fondation épistémique de la logique
Van der Schaar, Maria mailto
Springer Academic Publisher
Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science
Yes
No
International
978-94-007-5137-8
The Netherlands
Days of Judgement
27-29 septembre 2009
Maria Van der Schaar (Universiteit Leiden)
Leiden
Pays-Bas
[en] Judgement (Theory of) ; Wilhelm Windelband (1848-1915) ; Franz Brentano (1838-1917) ; Neo-Kantianism ; Predication ; Act ; Epistemic values ; Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) ; Wayne Martin
[fr] Jugement (Théorie du) ; Wilhelm Windelband (1848-1915) ; Franz Brentano (1838-1917) ; Evaluation ; Prédication ; Acte ; Valeurs (Théorie des) ; Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) ; Wayne Martin
[de] Urteil (Lehre von) ; Wilhelm Windelband (1848-1915) ; Franz Brentano (1838-1917) ; Werte (Philosophie der) ; Prädikation ; Akt ; Neukantianism ; Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) ; Wayne Martin
[en] A main challenge for philosophers of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century was to construct judgements as acts of decision or position (thesis) rather than as acts of combination or synthesis. Let us call this the thetic view. Franz Brentano (1838–1917) is usually regarded as the best supporter of this view, since he takes advantage of the Kantian-Herbartian notion of ‘position’ (Setzung) to break with the traditional definition of judgement as symplokè (Martin 2006, 64 sq.; see Brentano 2008, 335). Generally speaking I think this usual line of interpretation is quite cor- rect, yet it could benefit from a more detailed account of the Brentano reception. What I would like to suggest is this: At stake in Brentano’s legacy is not just the rejection of the synthetic view but also the way in which the thetic dimension is itself conceived. There are, in fact, various ways of constructing judgements as thetic or positional phenomena. Brentano’s notion of ‘existential assertion’ is not the only way to do so.
Phénoménologies
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/86956

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Restricted access
DEWALQUE_Windelband_Final_Draft.pdfFinal Draft (under contract with Springer)Author preprint197.85 kBRequest copy
Restricted access
Contract_Springer_Dewalque.pdfContractAuthor preprint139.78 kBRequest copy
Restricted access
Tiré-à-part_Windelband_Beurteilung.pdfBook Chapter in PDFPublisher postprint194.96 kBRequest copy

Additional material(s):

File Commentary Size Access
Open access
DaysOfJudgement_Abstract_Dewalque.pdfABSTRACT / Résumé (anglais)82.22 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.