Paper published in a book (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Windelband on Beurteilung
Dewalque, Arnaud
2013In Van der Schaar, Maria (Ed.) Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Tiré-à-part_Windelband_Beurteilung.pdf
Publisher postprint (199.63 kB)
Book Chapter in PDF
Request a copy
Full Text Parts
DEWALQUE_Windelband_Final_Draft.pdf
Author preprint (202.6 kB)
Final Draft (under contract with Springer)
Request a copy
Contract_Springer_Dewalque.pdf
Author preprint (143.14 kB)
Contract
Request a copy
Annexes
DaysOfJudgement_Abstract_Dewalque.pdf
Publisher postprint (84.2 kB)
ABSTRACT / Résumé (anglais)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Judgement (Theory of); Wilhelm Windelband (1848-1915); Franz Brentano (1838-1917); Neo-Kantianism; Predication; Act; Epistemic values; Immanuel Kant (1724-1804); Wayne Martin; Jugement (Théorie du); Evaluation; Prédication; Acte; Valeurs (Théorie des); Urteil (Lehre von); Werte (Philosophie der); Prädikation; Akt; Neukantianism
Abstract :
[en] A main challenge for philosophers of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century was to construct judgements as acts of decision or position (thesis) rather than as acts of combination or synthesis. Let us call this the thetic view. Franz Brentano (1838–1917) is usually regarded as the best supporter of this view, since he takes advantage of the Kantian-Herbartian notion of ‘position’ (Setzung) to break with the traditional definition of judgement as symplokè (Martin 2006, 64 sq.; see Brentano 2008, 335). Generally speaking I think this usual line of interpretation is quite cor- rect, yet it could benefit from a more detailed account of the Brentano reception. What I would like to suggest is this: At stake in Brentano’s legacy is not just the rejection of the synthetic view but also the way in which the thetic dimension is itself conceived. There are, in fact, various ways of constructing judgements as thetic or positional phenomena. Brentano’s notion of ‘existential assertion’ is not the only way to do so.
Research center :
Phénoménologies - ULiège
Disciplines :
Philosophy & ethics
Author, co-author :
Dewalque, Arnaud  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de philosophie > Phénoménologies
Language :
English
Title :
Windelband on Beurteilung
Alternative titles :
[fr] La théorie du jugement de Windelband
Publication date :
January 2013
Event name :
Days of Judgement
Event organizer :
Maria Van der Schaar (Universiteit Leiden)
Event place :
Leiden, Netherlands
Event date :
27-29 septembre 2009
Audience :
International
Main work title :
Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic
Main work alternative title :
[fr] Le Jugement et la fondation épistémique de la logique
Editor :
Van der Schaar, Maria
Publisher :
Springer Academic Publisher, Netherlands
Edition :
1e édition
ISBN/EAN :
978-94-007-5137-8
Collection name :
Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBi :
since 10 March 2011

Statistics


Number of views
212 (13 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
46 (8 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi