Reference : Validation of a model-based virtual trials method for tight glycemic control in intensiv...
Scientific journals : Article
Human health sciences : Endocrinology, metabolism & nutrition
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/80806
Validation of a model-based virtual trials method for tight glycemic control in intensive care.
English
Chase, J Geoffrey [> > > >]
Suhaimi, Fatanah [> > > >]
Penning, Sophie mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Thermodynamique des phénomènes irréversibles >]
Preiser, Jean-Charles [> >]
Le Compte, Aaron J [> > > >]
Lin, Jessica [> > > >]
Pretty, Christopher G [> > > >]
Shaw, Geoffrey M [> > > >]
Moorhead, Katherine [Université de Liège - ULg > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > Biochimie et physiologie générales, humaines et path. - Thermodynamique des phénomènes irréversibles >]
Desaive, Thomas mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Thermodynamique des phénomènes irréversibles - Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) >]
2010
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
BioMed Central
9
84
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
1475-925X
London
United Kingdom
[en] BACKGROUND: In-silico virtual patients and trials offer significant advantages in cost, time and safety for designing effective tight glycemic control (TGC) protocols. However, no such method has fully validated the independence of virtual patients (or resulting clinical trial predictions) from the data used to create them. This study uses matched cohorts from a TGC clinical trial to validate virtual patients and in-silico virtual trial models and methods. METHODS: Data from a 211 patient subset of the Glucontrol trial in Liege, Belgium. Glucontrol-A (N = 142) targeted 4.4-6.1 mmol/L and Glucontrol-B (N = 69) targeted 7.8-10.0 mmol/L. Cohorts were matched by APACHE II score, initial BG, age, weight, BMI and sex (p > 0.25). Virtual patients are created by fitting a clinically validated model to clinical data, yielding time varying insulin sensitivity profiles (SI(t)) that drives in-silico patients.Model fit and intra-patient (forward) prediction errors are used to validate individual in-silico virtual patients. Self-validation (tests A protocol on Group-A virtual patients; and B protocol on B virtual patients) and cross-validation (tests A protocol on Group-B virtual patients; and B protocol on A virtual patients) are used in comparison to clinical data to assess ability to predict clinical trial results. RESULTS: Model fit errors were small (<0.25%) for all patients, indicating model fitness. Median forward prediction errors were: 4.3, 2.8 and 3.5% for Group-A, Group-B and Overall (A+B), indicating individual virtual patients were accurate representations of real patients. SI and its variability were similar between cohorts indicating they were metabolically similar.Self and cross validation results were within 1-10% of the clinical data for both Group-A and Group-B. Self-validation indicated clinically insignificant errors due to model and/or clinical compliance. Cross-validation clearly showed that virtual patients enabled by identified patient-specific SI(t) profiles can accurately predict the performance of independent and different TGC protocols. CONCLUSIONS: This study fully validates these virtual patients and in silico virtual trial methods, and clearly shows they can accurately simulate, in advance, the clinical results of a TGC protocol, enabling rapid in silico protocol design and optimization. These outcomes provide the first rigorous validation of a virtual in-silico patient and virtual trials methodology.
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/80806
10.1186/1475-925X-9-84

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
1475-925X-9-84.pdfPublisher postprint473.68 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.