Article (Scientific journals)
How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing.
Godfroid, Jacques; Saegerman, Claude; Wellemans, Vincent et al.
2002In Veterinary Microbiology, 90 (1-4), p. 461-77
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
2002-How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis.pdf
Publisher postprint (217.63 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Animals; Brucella/immunology/isolation & purification; Brucellosis, Bovine/diagnosis/immunology/prevention & control; Cattle; European Union; Immunity, Cellular; Reproducibility of Results; Serologic Tests/methods; Skin Tests/veterinary; Yersinia/immunology
Abstract :
[en] Collaborative work was financed by the EU to develop and assess new diagnostic tools that can differentiate between bovine brucellosis and bovine infections due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 either in conjunction with, or as an alternative to, the classical serological, bacteriological or allergic skin tests. Sixteen heifers were experimentally infected with Brucella abortus biovar 1 (five heifers), Brucella suis biovar 2 (two heifers), Y. enterocolitica O:9 (six heifers) and Y. enterocolitica O:3 (three heifers). Four heifers, naturally infected with Y. enterocolitica O:9 that presented aspecific brucellosis serological reactions were also included in the experiment. A self-limited infection was induced in cattle by B. suis biovar 2. All the brucellosis serological tests used, i.e. the slow agglutination test (SAW), the Rose Bengal test (RB), the complement fixation test (CFT), indirect and competitive ELISA's, lacked specificity when used to analyze sera from Y. enterocolitica O:9 infected animals. A Yersinia outer membrane proteins (YOPs)-ELISA was also used and although the test is able to detect a Yersinia group infection, it provided no evidence of whether or not there is a possible brucellosis infection when dual infections are present. The brucellergen IFN-gamma test showed a lack of specificity also. The only test that was proven to be specific is the brucellergen skin test. All brucellosis serological tests, except the indirect ELISA, were limited in their ability to detect B. abortus persistently infected animals. Based on these experimental studies, a strategy was implemented as part of the year 2001 Belgian Brucellosis Eradication Program to substantiate the eradication of bovine brucellosis. Epidemiological inquiries have identified risk factors associated with aspecific serological reactions, possible transmission and infection of cattle by B. suis biovar 2 from infected wild boars; and both legal and administrative measures taken by the veterinary services. No cases of bovine brucellosis have been confirmed in Belgium since March 2000.
Disciplines :
Veterinary medicine & animal health
Author, co-author :
Godfroid, Jacques
Saegerman, Claude  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des maladies infectieuses et parasitaires > Epidémiologie et analyse des risques appl. aux sc. vétér.
Wellemans, Vincent
Walravens, Karl
Letesson, Jean*-Jacques
Tibor, Anne
Mc Millan, Alastair
Spencer, Steve
Sanna, Moez
Bakker, Douwe
Pouillot, Regis
Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
Language :
English
Title :
How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing.
Publication date :
2002
Journal title :
Veterinary Microbiology
ISSN :
0378-1135
eISSN :
1873-2542
Publisher :
Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Volume :
90
Issue :
1-4
Pages :
461-77
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Commentary :
Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.
Available on ORBi :
since 27 May 2010

Statistics


Number of views
122 (21 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
106
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
89
OpenCitations
 
80

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi