Reference : Whole-body positron emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with met...
Scientific journals : Article
Human health sciences : Radiology, nuclear medicine & imaging
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/5522
Whole-body positron emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with metastases of unknown primary tumours (CUP syndrome)
English
Alberini, J. L. [> > > >]
Belhocine, Tarik [> > > >]
Hustinx, Roland mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département des sciences cliniques > Médecine nucléaire]
Daenen, Frédéric [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Médecine nucléaire >]
Rigo, Pierre mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département des sciences de la motricité > Pathologie générale et médecine nucléaire >]
Oct-2003
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
24
10
1081-1086
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
0143-3636
Philadelphia
[en] positron emission tomography ; fluorodeoxyglucose ; metastases ; carcinoma of unknown primary ; CUP syndrome ; unknown primary tumours
[en] The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performances of whole body 2-[F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) imaging for the detection of the primary tumour in patients with metastases of unknown origin. Forty-one patients, without previous history of known cancer (18 women and 23 men; average age 64.1 years) with metastasis confirmed by histopathological analysis were included in a retrospective study. Results of PET were compared with those of techniques used in the current conventional diagnostic procedure. All known metastatic lesions were detected by PET. There were 26 true-positive and two false-negative results. Primary tumour remained undetermined in eight patients after conventional investigations and PET. PET was superior to conventional diagnostic procedure in 11 patients and led to modify treatment in 11 patients. Sensitivity of PET was superior than computed tomography in detecting abdominal primary tumours. FDG PET is useful in patients with unknown primary tumour because its sensitivity is good and it could modify the disease management. Otherwise, PET allows the evaluation of the extent of the disease and could be used to monitor treatment efficiency. Its contribution has to be evaluated particularly in patients with primary tumour with a specific treatment. ((C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins).
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/5522

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Restricted access
Alberini et al, Nucl Med Com 2003.pdfNo commentaryPublisher postprint103.74 kBRequest copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.