Reference : The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units: a systematic r...
Scientific journals : Article
Human health sciences : Geriatrics
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/5426
The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
English
Van Craen, Katleen [> > > >]
Braes, Tom [> > > >]
Wellens, Nathalie [> > > >]
Denhaerynck, Kris [> > > >]
Flamaing, Johan [> > > >]
Moons, Philip [> > > >]
Boonen, Steven [> > > >]
Gosset, Christiane mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique : aspects généraux >]
Petermans, Jean mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Gériatrie >]
Milisen, Koen [> > > >]
2010
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Blackwell Science
58
1
83-92
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
0002-8614
1532-5415
Malden
MA
[en] Aged ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans ; Inpatients
[en] OBJECTIVES: To examine how geriatric evaluation and management units (GEMUs) are organized and to examine the effectiveness of admission on a GEMU. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis based on literature search of multiple databases and the references lists of all identified articles and by contacting authors. SETTING: GEMUs. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly people admitted to a GEMU. MEASUREMENTS: Quality of the studies was assessed on 10 criteria. The outcome parameters were mortality, institutionalization, functional decline, readmission, and length of stay at different follow-up points. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Hedges' gu and variance of relative risk (RR). RESULTS: GEMUs are organized in a heterogeneous way and the included studies gave no thorough description of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Involvement of a multidisciplinary team was a key element in all GEMUs. The individual trials showed that admission to a GEMU has one or more favorable effects on the outcomes of interest, with two significant effects in the meta-analysis: less functional decline at discharge from the GEMU (RR=0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.77-0.99; P=.04) and a lower rate of institutionalization 1 year after discharge (RR=0.78, CI=0.66-0.92; P=.003). For the other outcomes in the meta-analysis, a GEMU did not induce significantly different outcomes than usual care. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows a significant effect in favor of the GEMU group on functional decline at discharge and on institutionalization after 1 year. There is heterogeneity between the studies, poor quality of some randomized controlled trials, and shortage of information about CGA. Multidisciplinary CGA offered in a GEMU may add value to the care for frail older persons admitted to the hospital, but the limitations confirm the need for well-designed studies using explicit CGA and more-structured and -coherent assessment instruments such as the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument.
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/5426
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02621.x

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Restricted access
The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units a systematic review and meta-analysis.pdfNo commentaryPublisher postprint150.09 kBRequest copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.