Article (Scientific journals)
Monitoring depth of anaesthesia: is it worth the effort?
Bonhomme, Vincent; Hans, Pol
2004In European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 21 (6), p. 423-8
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
421.pdf
Publisher postprint (721.58 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Anesthesia, General; Awareness; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Electroencephalography/instrumentation; Evoked Potentials, Auditory; Humans; Monitoring, Intraoperative/economics/instrumentation
Abstract :
[en] In this review paper, the authors critically analyse the use of a number of depth of anaesthesia monitors in light of the most recent literature and their own clinical experience. There appears to be increasing evidence that anaesthesia depth monitors reduce the incidence of unexpected intraoperative awareness and also that they improve the quality of anaesthesia. Proper use of these monitors necessitates background knowledge about the physiology of the loss of consciousness, the type of variable recorded and processed by the monitoring devices, the factors that might interfere with recording and the limits of use. The information provided by anaesthesia depth monitors is detailed and relationships with clinical practice are established to provide the reader with key features for optimal use of those monitors and correct interpretation of data. Practitioners and patient's knowledge and expectations regarding this matter, as well as the cost-benefit relationship are also discussed.
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Bonhomme, Vincent  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Anesthésie et réanimation
Hans, Pol ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Anesthésie et réanimation
Language :
English
Title :
Monitoring depth of anaesthesia: is it worth the effort?
Publication date :
2004
Journal title :
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
ISSN :
0265-0215
eISSN :
1365-2346
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Volume :
21
Issue :
6
Pages :
423-8
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 02 February 2009

Statistics


Number of views
63 (1 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
29
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
25
OpenCitations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi