Article (Scientific journals)
Sensitivity analysis of prior model probabilities and the value of prior knowledge in the assessment of conceptual model uncertainty in groundwater modelling
Rojas, Rodrigo; Feyen, Luc; Dassargues, Alain
2009In Hydrological Processes, 23, p. 1131-1146
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
publi171-2009.pdf
Author preprint (4.88 MB)
The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com
Download

We acknowledge Wiley-Blackwell. The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com


All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Groundwater modelling; conceptual model uncertainty; prior knowledge; maximum entropy; uncertainty assessment; multi-model prediction
Abstract :
[en] A key point in the application of multi-model Bayesian averaging techniques to assess the predictive uncertainty in groundwater modelling applications is the definition of prior model probabilities, which reflect the prior perception about the plausibility of alternative models. In this work the influence of prior knowledge and prior model probabilities on posterior model probabilities, multi-model predictions, and conceptual model uncertainty estimations is analysed. The sensitivity to prior model probabilities is assessed using an extensive numerical analysis in which the prior probability space of a set of plausible conceptualizations is discretized to obtain a large ensemble of possible combinations of prior model probabilities. Additionally, the value of prior knowledge about alternative models in reducing conceptual model uncertainty is assessed by considering three example knowledge states, expressed as quantitative relations among the alternative models. A constrained maximum entropy approach is used to find the set of prior model probabilities that correspond to the different prior knowledge states. For illustrative purposes, a three-dimensional hypothetical setup approximated by seven alternative conceptual models is employed. Results show that posterior model probabilities, leading moments of the predictive distributions and estimations of conceptual model uncertainty are very sensitive to prior model probabilities, indicating the relevance of selecting proper prior probabilities. Additionally, including proper prior knowledge improves the predictive performance of the multi-model approach, expressed by reductions of the multi-model prediction variances by up to 60% compared with a non-informative case. However, the ratio between-model to total variance does not substantially decrease. This suggests that the contribution of conceptual model uncertainty to the total variance cannot be further reduced based only on prior knowledge about the plausibility of alternative models. These results advocate including proper prior knowledge about alternative conceptualizations in combination with extra conditioning data to further reduce conceptual model uncertainty in groundwater modelling predictions.
Research center :
Aquapôle - ULiège
Disciplines :
Geological, petroleum & mining engineering
Author, co-author :
Rojas, Rodrigo;  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - KUL > Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences > Hydrogeology, Applied Mineralogy and Geology
Feyen, Luc;  DG Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra > Institute for Environment and Sustainability > Land management and natural hazards unit
Dassargues, Alain  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département Argenco : Secteur GEO3 > Hydrogéologie & Géologie de l'environnement
Language :
English
Title :
Sensitivity analysis of prior model probabilities and the value of prior knowledge in the assessment of conceptual model uncertainty in groundwater modelling
Publication date :
January 2009
Journal title :
Hydrological Processes
ISSN :
0885-6087
eISSN :
1099-1085
Publisher :
John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Chichester, United Kingdom
Volume :
23
Pages :
1131-1146
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 15 January 2009

Statistics


Number of views
252 (24 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
403 (9 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
28
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
24
OpenCitations
 
30

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi