Reference : Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): does it fulfil all its promises?
Scientific journals : Article
Human health sciences : Surgery
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/40283
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): does it fulfil all its promises?
English
Van Damme, Hendrik mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Chirurgie cardio-vasculaire >]
Creemers, Etienne mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Chirurgie cardio-vasculaire >]
Defraigne, Jean-Olivier mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département des sciences cliniques > Chirurgie cardio-vasculaire et thoracique >]
2009
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Acta Medica Belgica
109
4
436-43
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
0001-5458
Bruxelles
Belgique
[en] Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality/surgery ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Prosthesis Design ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome
[en] In the trend of the endovascular revolution for occlusive arterial disease, management of aneurysmal disease has known an analogous change in the nineties. Elective endo-aneurysmal stentgrafting (EVAR or endovascular aneurysm repair) is nowadays of widespread application in contemporary practice all over the world, sometimes by over-enthusiast proponents. There is a burden of recent publications on that topic. Critical analysis of relevant data reveal compelling evidence that elective EVAR is a safe procedure with a threefold reduced 30-day morbidity-mortality, when compared to conventional open aneurysm repair. EVAR also deemed efficace in terms of AAA rupture prevention. At the other hand, mid-term follow-up revealed that EVAR does not endure at the long-term in any late survival benefit, compared to open AAA repair. The major concern and drawback of EVAR is its higher cost and the need for indefinite, life-long surveillance, with a 20% reintervention rate (almost catheter-based endovascularly) at 5-year follow-up. In this review-paper, short-term gains of EVAR are balanced against the inherent disadvantages and long-term losses. According best available evidence, EVAR should not longer be the first choice for high-risk patients, judged unfit for open aneurysm repair. There also exist doubt on the use of EVAR in young fit patients with an anticipated long life expectancy. In approximately half of the AAA patients, EVAR can be considered as the appropriate treatment option.
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/40283
also: http://hdl.handle.net/2268/40282
contact : <cardiovasc@chu.ulg.ac.be>

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Restricted access
115.pdfPublisher postprint451.87 kBRequest copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.