You are here:
| Reference : Le compromis, rationalité et valeur. Esquisse d’une approche sociologique |
| Scientific journals : Article | |||
| Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Sociology & social sciences | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/2268/38940 | |||
| Le compromis, rationalité et valeur. Esquisse d’une approche sociologique | |
| French | |
Nachi, Mohamed  [Université de Liège - ULg > Institut des sciences humaines et sociales > Sociologie des nouvelles dynamiques sociales >] | |
| 2004 | |
| Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales | |
| Sage Publications | |
| 43 | |
| 2 | |
| 307-330 | |
| International | |
| 0539 0184 | |
| London/Paris | |
| Royaume-Uni-France | |
| [en] Accord – Action – Agreement – Arrangement – Compromise – Consensus – | |
| [en] The authors propose a reflection on the status of compromise in European
sociological tradition, and more particularly in two classical authors, Durkheim and Weber, as well as in several contemporary authors who follow in Weber’s footsteps. After having noted the absence of any reference to the idea of compromise in Durkheim’s work, they posit that it is nevertheless possible to detect the presence of compromise as an implicit category in Weber’s writings, notably through his distinction between different ethics. While it is explicitly present in the contemporary authors examined, the concept is related to the different proceduralization theories found in Habermas, Crozier, Sainsaulieu and Reynaud. | |
| Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/2268/38940 |
| File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
|
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.
