[en] Background: Arabidopsis thaliana is now the model organism for genetic and molecular plant studies, but growing conditions may still impair the significance and reproducibility of the experimental strategies developed. Besides the use of phytotronic cabinets, controlling plant nutrition may be critical and could be achieved in hydroponics. The availability of such a system would also greatly facilitate studies dealing with root development. However, because of its small size and rosette growth habit, Arabidopsis is hardly grown in standard hydroponic devices and the systems described in the last years are still difficult to transpose at a large scale. Our aim was to design and optimize an up-scalable device that would be adaptable to any experimental conditions. Results: An hydroponic system was designed for Arabidopsis, which is based on two units: a seed-holder and a 1-L tank with its cover. The original agar-containing seed-holder allows the plants to grow from sowing to seed set, without transplanting step and with minimal waste. The optimum nitrate supply was determined for vegetative growth, and the flowering response to photoperiod and vernalization was characterized to show the feasibility and reproducibility of experiments extending over the whole life cycle. How this equipment allowed to overcome experimental problems is illustrated by the analysis of developmental effects of nitrate reductase deficiency in nia1nia2 mutants. Conclusion: The hydroponic device described in this paper allows to drive small and large scale cultures of homogeneously growing Arabidopsis plants. Its major advantages are its flexibility, easy handling, fast maintenance and low cost. It should be suitable for many experimental purposes.
Koyama H, Toda T, Yokota S, Dawair Z and Hara T Effects of aluminium and pH on root growth and cell viability in Arabidopsis thaliana strain Landsberg in hydroponic culture. Plant Cell Physiol 1995, 36:201-205
Delhaize E and Randall PJ Characterization of a phosphate-accumulator mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 1995, 107:207-213
Hirai MY, Fujiwara T, Chino M and Naito S Effects of sulfate concentrations on the expression of a soybean seed storage protein gene and its reversibility in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 1995, 36:1331-1339
Gibeaut DM, Hulett J, Cramer GR and Seemann JR Maximal biomass of Arabidopsis thaliana using a simple, low-maintenance hydroponic method and favorable environmental conditions. Plant Physiol 1997, 115:317-319
Arteca RN and Arteca JM A novel method for growing Arabidopsis thaliana plants hydroponically. Physiol Plant 2000, 108:188-193
Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJM and Soppe W Genetic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1998, 49:345-370
Levy YY and Dean C The transition to flowering. Plant Cell 1998, 10:1973-1989
Périlleux C and Bernier G The control of flowering: do genetical and physiological approaches converge? In Plant Reproduction. Annual Plant Reviews (Edited by: O'Neill SD, Roberts JA) Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield 2002, 6:1-32
Corbesier L, Gadisseur I, Silvestre G, Jacqmard A and Bernier G Design in Arabidopsis thaliana of a synchronous system of floral induction by one long day. Plant J 1996, 9:947-952
Wilkinson JQ and Crawford NM Identification and characterization of a chlorate-resistant mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana with mutations in both nitrate reductase structural genes NIA1 and NIA2. Mol Gen Genet 1993, 239:289-297
Lang A Physiology of flower initiation. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology (Edited by: Ruhland W) Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1965, 1379-1536