Complementary Strategies for Biological Control of Aphids and Related Virus Transmission in Sugar Beet to Replace Neonicotinoids

Francis, Frédéric; Then, Christiane; Francis, Adrien; Gbangbo, Yao Aime Constant; Iannello, Lisa; Ben Fekih, Ibtissem

doi:10.3390/agriculture12101663

Article (Scientific journals)

Complementary Strategies for Biological Control of Aphids and Related Virus Transmission in Sugar Beet to Replace Neonicotinoids

Francis, Frédéric; Then, Christiane; Francis, Adrien et al.

2022 • In Agriculture, 12 (10), p. 1663

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/304439

DOI
10.3390/agriculture12101663

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Francis et al., 2022.pdf

Author postprint (581.57 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Aphis fabae; ecofriendly alternatives, host resistance; Myzus persicae; pesticides, soil-borne microbes; volatile organic compounds; Food Science; Agronomy and Crop Science; Plant Science

Abstract :

[en] Neonicotinoid-based real control of aphids in sugar beet permitted the effective management of associated phytoviruses. However, the prohibition on their usage has prompted an urgent search for viable replacements. The development of sugar beet varieties with aphid and/or virus resistance and/or tolerance has a huge potential to reduce aphids and the harm caused by transmitted viruses. Semiochemicals also play a significant part in determining intra- and inter-specific interactions, which directly affect aphid fitness, feeding activity, and ultimately their capacity to spread viruses. Another method of aphid management involves the use of plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in conjunction with an attract and kill strategy. Entomopathogenic fungi could also be used to manage aphids without endangering helpful entomofauna. Finally, soil bacteria are particularly effective biocontrol agents because they induce systemic resistance (ISR) as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). The sugar beet-aphid virus model would be a perfect place to test these microbial players. The adoption of complementing eco-compatible techniques in the sugar beet crop will be ensured by the application of a variety of biocontrol opportunities connected to creative aphid control strategies. This should make it possible to create technical itineraries for a comprehensive approach to controlling aphids and related viruses depending on the situation.

Disciplines :

Entomology & pest control

Author, co-author :

Francis, Frédéric ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Gestion durable des bio-agresseurs

Then, Christiane ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Gestion durable des bio-agresseurs

Francis, Adrien ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Chemistry for Sustainable Food and Environmental Systems (CSFES)

Gbangbo, Yao Aime Constant; Functional and Evolutionary Entomology, Terra, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Gembloux, Belgium

Iannello, Lisa ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre

Ben Fekih, Ibtissem ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Gestion durable des bio-agresseurs

Language :

English

Title :

Complementary Strategies for Biological Control of Aphids and Related Virus Transmission in Sugar Beet to Replace Neonicotinoids

Publication date :

October 2022

Journal title :

Agriculture

eISSN :

2077-0472

Publisher :

MDPI

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

1663

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Additional URL :

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1663/pdf

Funders :

SPW DGO6 - Service Public de Wallonie. Economie, Emploi, Recherche [BE]
WBI - Wallonia-Brussels International [BE]

Funding text :

CT was funded by the Service public de Wallonie economie emploi recherche, Beware program, project AphidVirBeet. IBF had a post-doc grant from Wallonia—Brussels International.

Data Set :

https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101663

Available on ORBi :

since 23 June 2023

Statistics

Number of views

22 (10 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

48 (5 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Biancardi E. Mcgrath J.M. Panella L.W. Lewellen R.T. Stevanato P. Sugar Beet Root and Tuber Crops Bradshaw J.E. Springer New York, NY, USA 2010 173 219
Stevens M. Patron N.J. Dolby C.A. Weekes R. Hallsworth P.B. Lemaire O. Smith H.G. Distribution and Properties of Geographically Distinct Isolates of Sugar Beet Yellowing Viruses Plant Pathol. 2005 54 100 107 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01155.x
Hossain R. Menzel W. Lachmann C. Varrelmann M. New Insights into Virus Yellows Distribution in Europe and Effects of Beet Yellows Virus, Beet Mild Yellowing Virus, and Beet Chlorosis Virus on Sugar Beet Yield Following Field Inoculation Plant Pathol. 2021 70 584 593 10.1111/ppa.13306
Stevens M. Hallsworth P.B. Smith H.G. The Effects of Beet Mild Yellowing Virus and Beet Chlorosis Virus on the Yield of UK Field-Grown Sugar Beet in 1997, 1999 and 2000 Ann. Appl. Biol. 2004 144 113 119 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00323.x
Elbert A. Haas M. Springer B. Thielert W. Nauen R. Applied Aspects of Neonicotinoid Uses in Crop Protection Pest Manag. Sci. 2008 64 1099 1105 10.1002/ps.1616 18561166
Schulz R. Bub S. Petschick L.L. Stehle S. Wolfram J. Applied Pesticide Toxicity Shifts toward Plants and Invertebrates, Even in GM Crops Science 2021 372 81 84 10.1126/science.abe1148
Hauer M. Hansen A.L. Manderyck B. Olsson Å. Raaijmakers E. Hanse B. Stockfisch N. Märländer B. Neonicotinoids in Sugar Beet Cultivation in Central and Northern Europe: Efficacy and Environmental Impact of Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments and Alternative Measures Crop Prot. 2017 93 132 142 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.034
Goulson D. Review: An Overview of the Environmental Risks Posed by Neonicotinoid Insecticides J. Appl. Ecol. 2013 50 977 987 10.1111/1365-2664.12111
Stuligross C. Williams N.M. Past Insecticide Exposure Reduces Bee Reproduction and Population Growth Rate Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021 118 e2109909118 10.1073/pnas.2109909118
Francis F. Martin T. Lognay G. Haubruge E. Role of (E)-Farnesene in Systematic Aphid Prey Location by Episyrphus Balteatus Larvae (Diptera: Syrphidae) Eur. J. Entomol. 2005 102 431 436 10.14411/eje.2005.061
Francis F. Lognay G. Haubruge E. Olfactory Responses to Aphid and Host Plant Volatile Releases: (E)-Beta-Farnesene an Effective Kairomone for the Predator Adalia Bipunctata J. Chem. Ecol. 2004 30 741 755 10.1023/B:JOEC.0000028429.13413.a2
Mauck K.E. De Moraes C.M. Mescher M.C. Infection of Host Plants by Cucumber Mosaic Virus Increases the Susceptibility of Myzus Persicae Aphids to the Parasitoid Aphidius Colemani Sci. Rep. 2015 5 10963 10.1038/srep10963
Dader B. Then C. Berthelot E. Ducousso M. Ng J.C.K. Drucker M. Insect Transmission of Plant Viruses: Multilayered Interactions Optimize Viral Propagation Insect Sci. 2017 24 929 946 10.1111/1744-7917.12470
Carmo-Sousa M. Moreno A. Plaza M. Garzo E. Fereres A. Cucurbit Aphid-Borne Yellows Virus (CABYV) Modifies the Alighting, Settling and Probing Behaviour of Its Vector Aphis Gossypii Favouring Its Own Spread Ann. Appl. Biol. 2016 169 284 297 10.1111/aab.12300
Mauck K.E. Chesnais Q. Shapiro L.R. Mauck K. Evolutionary Determinants of Host and Vector Manipulation by Plant Viruses Advances in Virus Research Elsevier Inc. Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2018 101 189 250
Ziegler-Graff V. Molecular Insights into Host and Vector Manipulation by Plant Viruses Viruses 2020 12 263 10.3390/v12030263 32121032
Wu X. Ye J. Manipulation of Jasmonate Signaling by Plant Viruses and Their Insect Vectors Viruses 2020 12 148 10.3390/v12020148 32012772
Casteel C.L. De Alwis M. Bak A. Dong H. Whitham S.A. Jander G. Disruption of Ethylene Responses by Turnip Mosaic Virus Mediates Suppression of Plant Defense against the Green Peach Aphid Vector Plant Physiol. 2015 169 209 218 10.1104/pp.15.00332 26091820
Bak A. Mackenzie P.F. Perilla-Henao L.M. Aegerter B.J. Casteel C.L. Ethylene Signaling Mediates Potyvirus Spread by Aphid Vectors Oecologia 2019 190 139 148 10.1007/s00442-019-04405-0 31065807
Ziebell H. Carr J.P. Cross-Protection: A Century of Mystery Adv. Virus Res. 2010 76 211 264 10.1016/S0065-3527(10)76006-1
Gal-On A. A Point Mutation in the FRNK Motif of the Potyvirus Helper Component-Protease Gene Alters Symptom Expression in Cucurbits and Elicits Protection Against the Severe Homologous Virus Phytopathology 2000 90 467 473 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.5.467
Wang W.-Q. Natsuaki T. Kosaka Seiichi Okuda Y. Wang W. Natsuaki T. Okuda S. Kosaka Y. Comparison of the Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequences of Parental and Attenuated Isolates of Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2006 72 52 56 10.1007/s10327-005-0248-6
Ziebell H. Payne T. Berry J.O. Walsh J.A. Carr J.P. A Cucumber Mosaic Virus Mutant Lacking the 2b Counter-Defence Protein Gene Provides Protection against Wild-Type Strains J. Gen. Virol. 2007 88 2862 2871 10.1099/vir.0.83138-0 17872541
Folimonova S.Y. Developing an Understanding of Cross-Protection by Citrus Tristeza Virus Front. Microbiol. 2013 4 2 9 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00076
Schlaefli H. Marmonier A. Chesnais Q. Villeroy C. Brault V. La Multi-Infection Virale de La Betterave à Sucre: Effets Sur l’Accumulation Des Virus et Leur Transmission Par Pucerons Proceedings of the Journées BAPOA Nice, France 17–18 May 2022
Francis S.A. Luterbacher M.C. Identification and Exploitation of Novel Disease Resistance Genes in Sugar Beet Pest Manag. Sci. 2003 59 225 230 10.1002/ps.569
Grimmer M.K. Bean K.M.R. Qi A. Stevens M. Asher M.J.C. The Action of Three Beet Yellows Virus Resistance QTLs Depends on Alleles at a Novel Genetic Locus That Controls Symptom Development Plant Breed. 2008 127 391 397 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01515.x
James L.C. Bean K.M.R. Grimmer M.K. Barnes S. Kraft T. Stevens M. Varieties of the Future: Identification of “broad Spectrum” Genetic Resistance in Sugar Beet Int. Sugar J. 2012 114 164 168
Zhang C.L. Xu D.C. Jiang X.C. Zhou Y. Cui J. Zhang C.X. Chen D.F. Fowler M.R. Elliott M.C. Scott N.W. et al. Genetic Approaches to Sustainable Pest Management in Sugar Beet (Beta Vulgaris) Ann. Appl. Biol. 2008 152 143 156 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00228.x
Truniger V. Aranda M. Recessive Resistance to Plant Viruses Adv. Virus Res. 2009 75 119 159 10.1016/S0065-3527(09)07504-6 20109665
Stevens M. Freeman B. Liu H.Y. Herrbach E. Lemaire O. Beet Poleroviruses: Close Friends or Distant Relatives? Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005 6 1 9 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00258.x 20565633
Jiang J. Laliberté J.F. The Genome-Linked Protein VPg of Plant Viruses—A Protein with Many Partners Curr. Opin. Virol. 2011 1 347 354 10.1016/j.coviro.2011.09.010
Reinbold C. Lacombe S. Ziegler-Graff V. Scheidecker D. Wiss L. Beuve M. Caranta C. Brault V. Closely Related Poleroviruses Depend on Distinct Translation Initiation Factors to Infect Arabidopsis Thaliana Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013 26 257 265 10.1094/MPMI-07-12-0174-R 23013438
Rollwage L. Hossain R. Varrelmann M. Zuckerrübe Infizierende Poleroviren Interagieren Mit Multiplen Translationsintiationsfaktoren Ihres Wirtes Proceedings of the 54. Jahrestagung des DPG ArbeitskreisesViruskrankheit der Pflanzen Dossenheim, Germany 21–22 March 2022
Smith H.G. Hallsworth P.B. The Effects of Yellowing Viruses on Yield of Sugar Beet in Field Trials, 1985 and 1987 Ann. Appl. Biol. 1990 116 503 511 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1990.tb06633.x
Dolja V.V. Beet Yellows Virus: The Importance of Being Different Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003 4 91 98 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00154.x
Gray S. Gildow F.E. Luteovirus-Aphid Interactions Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2003 41 539 566 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.012203.105815
Heathcote G.D. Aphids Caught on Sticky Traps in Eastern England in Relation to the Spread of Yellowing Viruses of Sugar-Beet Bull. Entomol. Res. 1974 64 669 676 10.1017/S0007485300035963
Heathcote G.D. The Time of Flight and the Relative Importance of Myzus Persicae (Sulz.) and Aphis Fabae Scop. in Relation to the Incidence of Beet Yellows as Shown by Trap Catches at Rothamsted and Broom’s Barn Bull. Entomol. Res. 1966 56 473 480 10.1017/S0007485300056534
Boissinot S. Pichon E. Sorin C. Piccini C. Scheidecker D. Ziegler-Graff V. Brault V. Systemic Propagation of a Fluorescent Infectious Clone of a Polerovirus Following Inoculation by Agrobacteria and Aphids Viruses 2017 9 166 10.3390/v9070166
Thielemann R. Nagi A. Welche Bedeutung Haben Die Zur “Aphis Fabae-Gruppe” Gehörenden Blattlausstämme für die Übertragung des Schwachen Vergilbungsvirus Auf Beta-Rüben? Z. Pflanz. Pflanzenschutz 1979 86 161 168
Mathers T.C. Chen Y. Kaithakottil G. Legeai F. Mugford S.T. Baa-Puyoulet P. Bretaudeau A. Clavijo B. Colella S. Collin O. et al. Rapid Transcriptional Plasticity of Duplicated Gene Clusters Enables a Clonally Reproducing Aphid to Colonise Diverse Plant Species Genome Biol. 2017 18 27 10.1186/s13059-016-1145-3
Bass C. Zimmer C.T. Riveron J.M. Wilding C.S. Wondji C.S. Kaussmann M. Field L.M. Williamson M.S. Nauen R. Gene Amplification and Microsatellite Polymorphism Underlie a Recent Insect Host Shift Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013 110 19460 19465 10.1073/pnas.1314122110
Witzgall P. Kirsch P. Cork A. Sex Pheromones and Their Impact on Pest Management J. Chem. Ecol. 2010 36 80 100 10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y
Smart L.E. Aradottir G.I. Bruce T.J.A. Chapter 6—Role of Semiochemicals in Integrated Pest Management Integrated Pest Management: Current Concepts and Ecological Perspective Abrol D.P. Academic Press Cambridge, MA, USA 2014 93 109
Sharma A. Sandhi R.K. Reddy G.V.P. A Review of Interactions between Insect Biological Control Agents and Semiochemicals Insects 2019 10 439 10.3390/insects10120439 31817457
Gregg P.C. Del Socorro A.P. Landolt P.J. Advances in Attract-and-Kill for Agricultural Pests: Beyond Pheromones Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018 63 453 470 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035040 29058978
Zhou H.-b. Chen J.-l. Liu Y. Francis F. Haubruge E. Bragard C. Sun J. Cheng D. Influence of Garlic Intercropping or Active Emitted Volatiles in Releasers on Aphid and Related Beneficial in Wheat Fields in China J. Integr. Agric. 2013 12 467 473 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60247-6
Xu Q. Hatt S. Lopes T. Zhang Y. Bodson B. Chen J. Francis F. A Push–Pull Strategy to Control Aphids Combines Intercropping with Semiochemical Releases J. Pest Sci. 2018 91 93 103 10.1007/s10340-017-0888-2
Zhou H. Chen L. Liu Y. Chen J. Francis F. Use of Slow-Release Plant Infochemicals to Control Aphids: A First Investigation in a Belgian Wheat Field Sci. Rep. 2016 6 31552 10.1038/srep31552
Xu Q. Hatt S. Han Z. Francis F. Chen J. Combining E-β-Farnesene and Methyl Salicylate Release with Wheat-Pea Intercropping Enhances Biological Control of Aphids in North China Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2018 28 883 894 10.1080/09583157.2018.1504885
Hardie J. Isaacs R. Pickett J.A. Wadhams L.J. Woodcock C.M. Methyl Salicylate and (−)-(1R,5S)-Myrtenal Are Plant-Derived Repellents for Black Bean Aphid, Aphis Fabae Scop. (Homoptera: Aphididae) J. Chem. Ecol. 1994 20 2847 2855 10.1007/BF02098393
Pettersson J. Pickett J.A. Pye B.J. Quiroz A. Smart L.E. Wadhams L.J. Woodcock C.M. Winter Host Component Reduces Colonization by Bird-Cherry Oat Aphid, Rhopalosiphum Padi (L.) (Homoptera, Aphididae), and Other Aphids in Cereal Fields J. Chem. Ecol. 1994 20 2565 2574 10.1007/BF02036192
Birkett M.A. Campbell C.A.M. Chamberlain K. Guerrieri E. Hick A.J. Martin J.L. Matthes M. Napier J.A. Pettersson J. Pickett J.A. et al. New Roles for Cis-Jasmone as an Insect Semiochemical and in Plant Defense Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000 97 9329 9334 10.1073/pnas.160241697
Ninkovic V. Ahmed E. Glinwood R. Pettersson J. Effects of Two Types of Semiochemical on Population Development of the Bird Cherry Oat Aphid Rhopalosiphum Padi in a Barley Crop Agric. Entomol. 2003 5 27 34 10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00159.x
Herrbach E. Effect of Dodecanoic Acid on the Colonisation of Sugar Beet by Aphids and the Secondary Spread of Virus Yellows Ann. Appl. Biol. 1987 111 477 482 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1987.tb01477.x
Boomsma J.J. Jensen A.B. Meyling N.V. Eilenberg J. Evolutionary Interaction Networks of Insect Pathogenic Fungi Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014 59 467 485 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162054 24160418
Lacey L.A. Grzywacz D. Shapiro-Ilan D.I. Frutos R. Brownbridge M. Goettel M.S. Insect Pathogens as Biological Control Agents: Back to the Future J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2015 132 1 41 10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009 26225455
Zimmermann G. Review on Safety of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium Anisopliae Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2007 17 879 920 10.1080/09583150701593963
Berbee M.L. The Phylogeny of Plant and Animal Pathogens in the Ascomycota Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2001 59 165 187 10.1006/pmpp.2001.0355
Vega F.E. Meyling N.V. Luangsa-Ard J.J. Blackwell M. Fungal Entomopathogens Insect Pathology Vega F. Kaya H. Academic Press San Diego, CA, USA 2012 171 220 9780123849847
Gange A.C. Koricheva J. Currie A.F. Jaber L.R. Vidal S. Meta-Analysis of the Role of Entomopathogenic and Unspecialized Fungal Endophytes as Plant Bodyguards New Phytol. 2019 223 2002 2010 10.1111/nph.15859 31002383
Keyser C.A. Jensen B. Meyling N.V. Dual Effects of Metarhizium Spp. and Clonostachys Rosea against an Insect and a Seed-Borne Pathogen in Wheat Pest Manag. Sci. 2016 72 517 526 10.1002/ps.4015 25827357
Mantzoukas S. Eliopoulos P.A. Endophytic Entomopathogenic Fungi: A Valuable Biological Control Tool against Plant Pests Appl. Sci. 2020 10 360 10.3390/APP10010360
Rasool S. Vidkjær N.H. Hooshmand K. Jensen B. Fomsgaard I.S. Meyling N.V. Seed Inoculations with Entomopathogenic Fungi Affect Aphid Populations Coinciding with Modulation of Plant Secondary Metabolite Profiles across Plant Families New Phytol. 2021 229 1715 1727 10.1111/nph.16979 33006149
Saranya S. Ushakumari R. Jacob S. Philip B.M. Efficacy of Different Entomopathogenic Fungi against Cowpea Aphid, Aphis Craccivora (Koch) J. Biopestic. 2010 3 138 142
Shan L.T. Feng M.G. Evaluation of the Biocontrol Potential of Various Metarhizium Isolates against Green Peach Aphid Myzus Persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae) Pest Manag. Sci. 2010 66 669 675 10.1002/ps.1928 20201034
Mweke A. Ulrichs C. Nana P. Akutse K.S. Fiaboe K.K.M. Maniania N.K. Ekesi S. Evaluation of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Metarhizium Anisopliae, Beauveria Bassiana and Isaria Sp. for the Management of Aphis Craccivora (Hemiptera: Aphididdae) J. Econ. Entomol. 2018 111 1587 1594 10.1093/jee/toy135
Reingold V. Kottakota C. Birnbaum N. Goldenberg M. Lebedev G. Ghanim M. Ment D. Intraspecies Variation of Metarhizium Brunneum against the Green Peach Aphid, Myzus Persicae, Provides Insight into the Complexity of Disease Progression Pest Manag. Sci. 2021 77 2557 2567 10.1002/ps.6294
Branine M. Bazzicalupo A. Branco S. Biology and Applications of Endophytic Insect-Pathogenic Fungi PLoS Pathog. 2019 15 e1007831 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007831
Lovett B. St. Leger R.J. Stress Is the Rule Rather than the Exception for Metarhizium Curr. Genet. 2015 61 253 261 10.1007/s00294-014-0447-9 25239135
Finkel O.M. Castrillo G. Herrera Paredes S. Salas González I. Dangl J.L. Understanding and Exploiting Plant Beneficial Microbes Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017 38 155 163 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.04.018
Conrath U. Beckers G.J.M. Flors V. García-Agustín P. Jakab G. Mauch F. Newman M.A. Pieterse C.M.J. Poinssot B. Pozo M.J. et al. Priming: Getting Ready for Battle Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006 19 1062 1071 10.1094/MPMI-19-1062 17022170
Conrath U. Chapter 9 Priming of Induced Plant Defense Responses Advances in Botanical Research Academic Press Cambridge, MA, USA 2009 Volume 51 361 395
Zamioudis C. Pieterse C.M.J. Modulation of Host Immunity by Beneficial Microbes Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012 25 139 150 10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0179
Pieterse C.M.J. Zamioudis C. Berendsen R.L. Weller D.M. Van Wees S.C.M. Bakker P.A.H.M. Induced Systemic Resistance by Beneficial Microbes Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2014 52 347 375 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 24906124
Disi J. Simmons J. Zebelo S. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria-Induced Defense Against Insect Herbivores Field Crops: Sustainable Management by PGPR Springer Cham, Switzerland 2019 385 410 10.1007/978-3-030-30926-8_14
Ongena M. Thonart P. Resistance Induced in Plants by Non-Pathogenic Microorganisms: Elicitation and Defense Responses Floric. Ornam. Plant Biotechnol. 2006 3 447 463
Jourdan E. Ongena M. Thonart P. Caractéristiques Moléculaires de l’immunité Des Plantes Induite Par Les Rhizobactéries Non Pathogènes Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2008 12 437 449
Yu Y. Gui Y. Li Z. Jiang C. Guo J. Niu D. Induced Systemic Resistance for Improving Plant Immunity by Beneficial Microbes Plants 2022 11 2 19 10.3390/plants11030386
Rabbee M.F. Sarafat Ali M. Choi J. Hwang B.S. Jeong S.C. Baek K. Bacillus Velezensis: A Valuable Member of Bioactive Molecules within Plant Microbiomes Molecules 2019 24 1046 10.3390/molecules24061046 30884857
Karthiba L. Saveetha K. Suresh S. Raguchander T. Saravanakumar D. Samiyappan R. PGPR and Entomopathogenic Fungus Bioformulation for the Synchronous Management of Leaffolder Pest and Sheath Blight Disease of Rice Pest Manag. Sci. 2010 66 555 564 10.1002/ps.1907 20069626
Cawoy H. Mariutto M. Henry G. Fisher C. Vasilyeva N. Thonart P. Dommes J. Ongena M. Plant Defense Stimulation by Natural Isolates of Bacillus Depends on Efficient Surfactin Production Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2014 27 87 100 10.1094/MPMI-09-13-0262-R
Debois D. Fernandez O. Franzil L. Jourdan E. de Brogniez A. Willems L. Clément C. Dorey S. De Pauw E. Ongena M. Plant Polysaccharides Initiate Underground Crosstalk with Bacilli by Inducing Synthesis of the Immunogenic Lipopeptide Surfactin Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2015 7 570 582 10.1111/1758-2229.12286 25731631