[en] BACKGROUND: Patients in a minimally conscious state (MCS) show restricted self or environment awareness but are unable to communicate consistently and reliably. Therefore, better understanding of cerebral noxious processing in these patients is of clinical, therapeutic, and ethical relevance. METHODS: We studied brain activation induced by bilateral electrical stimulation of the median nerve in five patients in MCS (aged 18-74 years) compared with 15 controls (19-64 years) and 15 patients (19-75 years) in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) with (15)O-radiolabelled water PET. By way of psychophysiological interaction analysis, we also investigated the functional connectivity of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in patients and controls. Patients in MCS were scanned 57 (SD 33) days after admission, and patients in PVS 36 (9) days after admission. Stimulation intensities were 8.6 (SD 6.7) mA in patients in MCS, 7.4 (5.9) mA in controls, and 14.2 (8.7) mA in patients in PVS. Significant results were thresholded at p values of less than 0.05 and corrected for multiple comparisons. FINDINGS: In patients in MCS and in controls, noxious stimulation activated the thalamus, S1, and the secondary somatosensory or insular, frontoparietal, and anterior cingulate cortices (known as the pain matrix). No area was less activated in the patients in MCS than in the controls. All areas of the cortical pain matrix showed greater activation in patients in MCS than in those in PVS. Finally, in contrast with patients in PVS, those in MCS had preserved functional connectivity between S1 and a widespread cortical network that includes the frontoparietal associative cortices. INTERPRETATION: Cerebral correlates of pain processing are found in a similar network in controls and patients in MCS but are much more widespread than in patients in PVS. These findings might be objective evidence of a potential pain perception capacity in patients in MCS, which supports the idea that these patients need analgesic treatment.
Research center :
GIGA CRC (Cyclotron Research Center) In vivo Imaging-Aging & Memory - ULiège
Disciplines :
Neurology
Author, co-author :
Boly, Mélanie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Neurologie
Faymonville, Marie-Elisabeth ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Services généraux (Faculté de médecine) > Relations académiques et scientifiques (Médecine)
Schnakers, Caroline; Université de Liège - ULiège > Centre de recherches du cyclotron
Peigneux, Philippe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Département des sciences cognitives
Bernat J.L. Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet 367 (2006) 1181-1192
Giacino J.T., Ashwal S., Childs N., et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58 (2002) 349-353
Laureys S., and Boly M. What is it like to be vegetative or minimally conscious?. Curr Opin Neurol 20 (2007) 609-613
Teasdale G., and Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2 (1974) 81-84
Starmark J.E., Stalhammar D., Holmgren E., and Rosander B. A comparison of the Glasgow coma scale and the reaction level scale (RLS85). J Neurosurg 69 (1988) 699-706
Benzer A., Mitterschiffthaler G., Marosi M., et al. Prediction of non-survival after trauma: Innsbruck Coma Scale. Lancet 338 (1991) 977-978
Sugiura K., Muraoka K., Chishiki T., and Baba M. The Edinburgh-2 coma scale: a new scale for assessing impaired consciousness. Neurosurgery 12 (1983) 411-415
Giacino J.T., Kalmar K., and Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 (2004) 2020-2029
Fins J.J., Illes J., Bernat J.L., Hirsch J., Laureys S., and Murphy E. Neuroimaging and disorders of consciousness: envisioning an ethical research agenda. Am J Bioeth 8 (2008) 37-46
Laureys S., Faymonville M.E., Peigneux P., et al. Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state. Neuroimage 17 (2002) 732-741
Giacino J.T., Kezmarsky M.A., DeLuca J., and Cicerone K.D. Monitoring rate of recovery to predict outcome in minimally responsive patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72 (1991) 897-901
The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. N Engl J Med 330 (1994) 1499-1508
Giacino J.T., Ashwal S., Childs N., et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58 (2002) 349-353
Lesser R.P., Koehle R., and Lueders H. Effect of stimulus intensity on short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 47 (1979) 377-382
Madl C., Kramer L., Domanovits H., et al. Improved outcome prediction in unconscious cardiac arrest survivors with sensory evoked potentials compared with clinical assessment. Crit Care Med 28 (2000) 721-726
World Medical Association. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA 277 (1997) 925-926
Charlton E. Ethical guidelines for pain research in humans. Committee on Ethical Issues of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Pain 63 (1995) 277-278
Peigneux P., Maquet P., Meulemans T., et al. Striatum forever, despite sequence learning variability: a random effect analysis of PET data. Hum Brain Mapp 10 (2000) 179-194
Boly M., Faymonville M.E., Peigneux P., et al. Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state. Arch Neurol 61 (2004) 233-238
Genovese C.R., Lazar N.A., and Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 15 (2002) 870-878
Owen A.M., Coleman M.R., Boly M., Davis M.H., Laureys S., and Pickard J.D. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 313 (2006) 1402
Nichols T., Brett M., Andersson J., Wager T., and Poline J.B. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 25 (2005) 653-660
IASP. Classification of Chronic Pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Task force on taxonomy (1994), IASP Press, Seatle
Halliburton J.R. Awareness during general anesthesia: new technology for an old problem. CRNA 9 (1998) 39-43
Klein M. Perception of pain in the persistent vegetative state?. Eur J Pain 1 (1997) 165-167
Zeman A. Persistent vegetative state. Lancet 350 (1997) 795-799
Schnakers C., and Zasler N.D. Pain assessment and management in disorders of consciousness. Curr Opin Neurol 20 (2007) 620-626
Boly M., Balteau E., Schnakers C., et al. Baseline brain activity fluctuations predict somatosensory perception in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 (2007) 12187-12192
Craig A.D. A new view of pain as a homeostatic emotion. Trends Neurosci 26 (2003) 303-307
Coghill R.C., and Eisenach J. Individual differences in pain sensitivity: implications for treatment decisions. Anesthesiology 98 (2003) 1312-1314
Treede R.D., Kenshalo D.R., Gracely R.H., and Jones A.K. The cortical representation of pain. Pain 79 (1999) 105-111
Peyron R., Laurent B., and Garcia-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiol Clin 30 (2000) 263-288
Singer T., Seymour B., O'Doherty J., Kaube H., Dolan R.J., and Frith C.D. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303 (2004) 1157-1162
Oshiro Y., Fuijita N., Tanaka H., Hirabuki N., Nakamura H., and Yoshiya I. Functional mapping of pain-related activation with echo-planar MRI: significance of the SII-insular region. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 2285-2289
Ostrowsky K., Magnin M., Ryvlin P., Isnard J., Guenot M., and Mauguiere F. Representation of pain and somatic sensation in the human insula: a study of responses to direct electrical cortical stimulation. Cereb Cortex 12 (2002) 376-385
Hofbauer R.K., Fiset P., Plourde G., Backman S.B., and Bushnell M.C. Dose-dependent effects of propofol on the central processing of thermal pain. Anesthesiology 100 (2004) 386-394
Rees G., Kreiman G., and Koch C. Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 3 (2002) 261-270
Dehaene S., Changeux J.P., Naccache L., Sackur J., and Sergent C. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends Cogn Sci 10 (2006) 204-211
Bornhovd K., Quante M., Glauche V., Bromm B., Weiller C., and Buchel C. Painful stimuli evoke different stimulus-response functions in the amygdala, prefrontal, insula and somatosensory cortex: a single-trial fMRI study. Brain 125 (2002) 1326-1336
Zeman A. Consciousness. Brain 124 (2001) 1263-1289
Rees G. Neural correlates of the contents of visual awareness in humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362 (2007) 877-886
Derbyshire S.W., Jones A.K., Gyulai F., Clark S., Townsend D., and Firestone L.L. Pain processing during three levels of noxious stimulation produces differential patterns of central activity. Pain 73 (1997) 431-445
Rainville P., Duncan G.H., Price D.D., Carrier B., and Bushnell M.C. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 277 (1997) 968-971
Buchel C., Bornhovd K., Quante M., Glauche V., Bromm B., and Weiller C. Dissociable neural responses related to pain intensity, stimulus intensity, and stimulus awareness within the anterior cingulate cortex: a parametric single-trial laser functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 22 (2002) 970-976
Boly M., Phillips C., Tshibanda L., et al. Intrinsic brain activity in altered states of consciousness: how conscious is the default mode of brain function?. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1129 (2008) 119-129
Boly M., Phillips C., Balteau E., et al. Consciousness and cerebral baseline activity fluctuations. Hum Brain Mapp 29 (2008) 868-874
