Reference : Chronic tension-type headache: what is new?
Scientific journals : Article
Human health sciences : Neurology
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/23518
Chronic tension-type headache: what is new?
English
Fernandez-de-las-Penas, Cesar [> > > >]
Schoenen, Jean mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > Neuro-anatomie >]
2009
Current Opinion in Neurology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
22
3
254-61
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
1350-7540
1473-6551
London
England
[en] Acupuncture ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use ; Comorbidity ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Fibromyalgia/physiopathology ; Humans ; Migraine Disorders/physiopathology ; Pain/physiopathology ; Pressure ; Tension-Type Headache/drug therapy/physiopathology
[en] PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses current data on nosological boundaries related to diagnosis, pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies in chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). RECENT FINDINGS: Diagnostic criteria of CTTH should be adapted to improve its sensitivity against migraine. It seems that mechanical pain sensitivity is a consequence and not a causative factor of CTTH. Recent evidence is modifying previous knowledge about relationships between muscle tissues and CTTH, suggesting a potential role of muscle trigger points in the genesis of pain. An updated pain model suggests that headache perception can be explained by referred pain from trigger points in the craniocervical muscles, mediated through the spinal cord and the trigeminal nucleus caudalis rather than only tenderness of the muscles themselves. Different therapeutic strategies, pharmacological, physical therapy, psychological and acupuncture, are generally used. The therapeutic efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remains incomplete. The tricyclic antidepressants are the most used first-line therapeutic agents for CTTH. Surprisingly, few controlled studies have been performed and not all of them have found an efficacy superior to placebo. Further, there is insufficient evidence to support/refute the efficacy of physical therapy in CTTH. SUMMARY: Although there is an increasing scientific interest in CTTH, future studies incorporating subgroups of patients who will likely to benefit from a specific treatment (clinical prediction rules) should be conducted.
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/23518
10.1097/WCO.0b013e32832973ce

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Restricted access
chronic tension-type headache peñas et al 09.pdfPublisher postprint175.66 kBRequest copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.