Air travel behavior; Itinerary choice; Nested logit
Abstract :
[en] Discrete choice models are commonly used to forecast the probability an airline passenger chooses a specific itinerary. In a prior study, we estimated an itinerary choice model based on a multinomial logit specification that corrected for price endogeneity. In this paper, we extend the analysis to include inter-itinerary competition along three dimensions: nonstop versus connecting level of service, carrier, and time of day using nested logit (NL) and ordered generalized extreme value (OGEV) models. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first NL and OGEV itinerary choice models to correct for price endogeneity. Despite the many structural changes that have occurred in the airline industry, our results are strikingly similar to models estimated more than a decade ago. These results are important because it suggests that customer preferences, on average, have been stable over time and are similar across distribution channels. The stability in inter-itinerary competition patterns provides an important practical implication for airlines, namely it reduces the need to frequently update the parameter estimates for these models.
Abou-Zeid, M., Rossi, T.F., Gardner, B., 2006. Modeling time of day choice in the context of tour and activity based models. In: Paper presented at the 85th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
ALOGIT 4.3, 2016. ALOGIT Software & Analysis Ltd.
Bierlaire, M., 2016. PythonBiogeme: A Short Introduction. Report TRANSP-OR 160706, Transport and Mobility Laboratory, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland.
Carrier, E., 2008. Modeling the Choice of an Airline Itinerary and Fare Product Using Booking and Seat Availability Data. (Ph.D. Dissertation), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Coldren, G.M., 2005. Modeling the Competitive Dynamic among Air-travel Itineraries with Generalized Extreme Value Models. (Ph.D. Dissertation), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Coldren, G.M., Koppelman, F.S., Modeling the competition among air-travel itinerary shares: GEV model development. Transp. Res. Part A 39:4 (2005), 345–365.
Coldren, G.M., Koppelman, F.S., Modeling the proximate covariance property of air travel itineraries along the time-of-day dimension. Transp. Res. Rec. 1915 (2005), 112–123.
Coldren, G.M., Koppelman, F.S., Kasturirangan, K., Mukherjee, A., Modeling aggregate air-travel itinerary shares: logit model development at a major U.S. airline. J. Air Transp. Manage. 9:6 (2003), 361–369.
Fosgerau, M., McFadden, D., Bierlaire, M., Choice probability generating functions. J. Choice Modell. 8 (2013), 1–18.
Garrow, L.A., Discrete Choice Modelling and Air Travel Demand: Theory and Applications. 2010, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, United Kingdom.
Greene, W.H., 2003. Econometric Analysis. Ed. Rod Banister, fifth ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Guevara-Cue, C.A., 2010. Endogeneity and sampling of alternatives in spatial choice models. (Ph.D. Dissertation), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Guevara, C., Critical assessment of five methods to correct for endogeneity in discrete-choice models. Transp. Res. Part A 82:4 (2015), 240–254.
Guevara, C.A., Ben-Akiva, M., Endogeneity in residential location choice models. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1977 (2006), 60–66.
Guevara, C., Navarro, P., 2013. Control-Function Correction with Weak Instruments in Logit Models. Working paper, Universidad de los Andes, Chile.
Hausman, J.A., 1996. Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. In: Gordon, Robert J., Bresnahan, Timothy F. (Eds.), The Economics of New Goods. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 207–248.
Hausman, J., Leonard, G., Zona, J.D., Competitive analysis with differentiated products. Ann. Econ. Stat. 34 (1994), 159–180.
Howard, C., 2016. Email communication between Chris Howard at the Airlines Reporting Corporation and Laurie Garrow on February 22, 2016.
Jacobs, T.L., Garrow, L.A., Lohatepanont, M., Koppelman, F.S., Coldren, G.M., Purnomo, H., 2012. Airline planning and schedule development. In: Barnhart, C., Smith, B. (Eds.), Quantitative Problem Solving Methods in the Airline Industry: A Modeling Methodology Handbook. Part of the Fred Hillier International Series on Operations Research and Management Sciences. vol. 169. Springer, New York, pp. 35–100.
Koppelman, F.S., Coldren, G.C., Parker, R.A., Schedule delay impacts on air-travel itinerary demand. Transp. Res. Part B 42:3 (2008), 263–273.
Lurkin, V., Garrow, L.A., Higgins, M.J., Newman, J.P., Schyns, M., Accounting for price endogeneity in airline itinerary choice models: an application to Continental U.S. markets. Transp. Res. Part A 100 (2017), 228–246.
McFadden, D., Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka, P., (eds.) Frontiers in Econometrics, 1974, Academic Press, New York, 105–142.
McFadden, D., Modeling the choice of residential location. Karlqvist, A., (eds.) Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, 1978, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 75–96.
Newman, J.P., 2016b. Larch: Source Code. Available at https://github.com/jpn–/larch.
Newman, J.P., Lurkin, V., Garrow, L.A., 2017. Computational methods for estimating multinomial, nested, and cross-nested logit models that account for semi-aggregate data. In: Paper Presented at the 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
Newman, J.P., Lurkin, V., Garrow, L.A., Computational methods for estimating multinomial, nested, and cross-nested logit models that account for semi-aggregate data. J. Choice Model. 26 (2018), 28–40.
Rivers, D., Vuong, Q.H., Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. J. Econom. 39 (1988), 347–366.
Small, K.A., A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 55:2 (1987), 409–457.
Staiger, D., Stock, J.H., Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econom.: J. Econ. Soc. 65 (1997), 557–586.
Stata Statistical Software, Release 14. 2015, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX.
Stern, S. 1996. Market definition and the returns to innovation: Substitution patterns in pharmaceutical markets. Working paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics (Q2, 2013 and Q1, 2000) Origin and Destination Survey Databank 1A/1B. http://www.transtats.bts.gov (accessed 01.18.2016).
