Article (Scientific journals)
Thinking like a rat
Despret, Vinciane; Bussolini, Jeffrey
2015In Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 20 (2), p. 121-134
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
10 - Thinking Like a Rat, Angelaki 20.2.pdf
Publisher postprint (183.83 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Jakob von Uexkull. Perpsectivism/ Ethology/ Laboratory practices. Epistemology.
Abstract :
[en] In submitting rats to tests such as running a maze, behaviorist researchers failed to take into account the interest and point of view of the rats. As a result, the research missed important questions and relations at hand. The critiques about experimenter effect and intuitive perception of researchers questions by research subjects can be more fully extended to animals as research subjects and interactants in research who perceive and interpret situations, set-ups, and questions. Taking meaning and biosemiotics into account helps give a better model of animal subjectivity as exercised in the interpretation of situations and the pursuit of interest. © 2015 Taylor & Francis.
Disciplines :
Philosophy & ethics
Author, co-author :
Despret, Vinciane ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de philosophie > Département de philosophie
Translator :
Bussolini, Jeffrey;  Sociology - Anthropology Department, City University of New York, 2800 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island, NY, United States
Language :
English
Title :
Thinking like a rat
Publication date :
2015
Journal title :
Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities
ISSN :
0969-725X
eISSN :
1469-2899
Publisher :
Routledge
Volume :
20
Issue :
2
Pages :
121-134
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 01 December 2017

Statistics


Number of views
162 (6 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
494 (5 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
25
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
24
OpenCitations
 
14

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi