Article (Scientific journals)
Untangling glycaemia and mortality in critical care
Uyttendaele, Vincent; Dickson, Jennifer L.; Shaw, Geoffrey M. et al.
2017In Critical Care, 21 (1), p. 152
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
s13054-017-1725-y.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.56 MB)
Full OA article
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Hyperglycaemia; Glycaemic Control; Blood glucose; Variability; Insulin Sensitivity; Critical Care
Abstract :
[en] Background: Hyperglycaemia is associated with adverse outcomes in the intensive care unit, and initial studies suggested outcome benefits of glycaemic control (GC). However, subsequent studies often failed to replicate these results, and they were often unable to achieve consistent, safe control, raising questions about the benefit or harm of GC as well as the nature of the association of glycaemia with mortality and clinical outcomes. In this study, we evaluated if non-survivors are harder to control than survivors and determined if glycaemic outcome is a function of patient condition and eventual outcome or of the glycaemic control provided. Methods: Clinically validated, model-based, hour-to-hour insulin sensitivity (SI) and its hour-to-hour variability (%ΔSI) were identified over the first 72 h of therapy in 145 patients (119 survivors, 26 non-survivors). In hypothesis testing, we compared distributions of SI and %ΔSI in 6-hourly blocks for survivors and non-survivors. In equivalence testing, we assessed if differences in these distributions, based on blood glucose measurement error, were clinically significant. Results: SI level was never equivalent between survivors and non-survivors (95% CI of percentage difference in medians outside ±12%). Non-survivors had higher SI, ranging from 9% to 47% higher overall in 6-h blocks, and this difference became statistically significant as glycaemic control progressed. %ΔSI was equivalent between survivors and non-survivors for all 6-hourly blocks (95% CI of difference in medians within ±12%) and decreased in general over time as glycaemic control progressed. Conclusions: Whereas non-survivors had higher SI levels, variability was equivalent to that of survivors over the first 72 h. These results indicate survivors and non-survivors are equally controllable, given an effective glycaemic control protocol, suggesting that glycaemia level and variability, and thus the association between glycaemia and outcome, are essentially determined by the control provided rather than by underlying patient or metabolic condition.
Research center :
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury
Giga-In silico medicine, University of Liège
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Uyttendaele, Vincent ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Form. doct. sc. ingé. & techno. (aéro. & mécan. - Paysage)
Dickson, Jennifer L.
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Desaive, Thomas  ;  Université de Liège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Thermodynamique des phénomènes irréversibles
Chase, J. Geoffrey
Language :
English
Title :
Untangling glycaemia and mortality in critical care
Publication date :
24 June 2017
Journal title :
Critical Care
ISSN :
1364-8535
eISSN :
1466-609X
Publisher :
BioMed Central, London, United Kingdom
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Pages :
152
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 26 June 2017

Statistics


Number of views
99 (25 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
109 (3 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
55
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
13
OpenCitations
 
45

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi