[en] Abstract: Flowers are frequently treated with pesticides and, as a result, florists handling daily a large number of flowers can be exposed to pesticide residues. A study was conducted among twenty volunteer florists located in Namur Province and in the Brussels Capital Region of Belgium in order to assess their potential dermal exposure to dislodgeable pesticide residues transferred from flowers to hands. Two pairs of cotton gloves were worn during two consecutive half days while handling flowers and preparing bouquets (from min 2 h to max 3 h/day). The residual pesticide deposits on the glove samples were extracted with a multi-residue Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged Safe (QuEChERS) method and analyzed by a combination of gas and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS) by an accredited laboratory. A total of 111 active substances (mainly insecticides and fungicides) were detected, with an average of 37 active substances per sample and a total concentration per glove sample of 22.22 mg/kg. Several predictive levels of contamination were considered to assess the risk. The potential dermal exposures (PDE) of florists were estimated at the average, for different percentiles, and at the maximum concentration of residues in samples. At the PDE P90 and at the PDEMAX (or worst case) values, three and five active substances respectively exceed the Acceptable Operator Exposure Level (AOEL), indicating risk situations. For the systemic exposure (SE), one active substance (clofentezine) exceeds the AOEL at the P90 predictive level. In the worst case, SEMAX (at the maximum concentrations), four active substances (clofentezine, famoxadone, methiocarb, and pyridaben) exceed their respective AOEL values. Among the 14 most frequently detected active substances, two have SEMAX values exceeding the AOEL. Exposure could be particularly critical for clofentezine with an SEMAX value four times higher than the AOEL (393%). The exposure of florists appeared to be an example of a unique professional situation in which workers are exposed regularly to both a very high number of toxic chemicals and rather high concentration levels. Therefore the priority should be to raise the level of awareness among the florists who must change their habits and practices if they want to minimize their exposure.
Cooper, J.; Dobson, H. The benefits of pesticides to mankind and the environment. Crop Prot. 2007, 26, 1337–1348. [CrossRef]
Bethke, J.A.; Cloyd, R.A. Pesticide use in ornamental production: What are the benefits? Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 345–350. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Morse, D.L.; Baker, E.L.; Landrigan, P.J. Cut flowers: A potential pesticide hazard. Am. J. Public Health 1979, 69, 53–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toumi, K.; Vleminckx, C.; Van Loco, J.; Schiffers, B. Pesticide residues on three cut flower species and potential exposure of florists in Belgium. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 943. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toumi, K.; Vleminckx, C.; Van Loco, J.; Schiffers, B. A survey of pesticides residues in cut flowers from various countries. Commun. Appl. Biol. Sci. Ghent Univ. 2016, 81, 493–502.
Rikken, M. Le Marché Européen des Fleurs et Plantes Équitables et Durables (The European Market for Equitable and Sustainable Flowers and Plants). Available online: http://www.befair.be/sites/default/files/all-files/brochure/Le%20march%C3%A9%20europ%C3%A9en%20des%20fleurs%20et%20plantes%20% C3%A9quitables%20et%20dur%E2%80%A6_0.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2017).
Baldi, I.; Cordier, S.; Coumoul, X.; Elbaz, A.; Gamet-Payrastre, L.; Le Bailly, P. Pesticides: Effets sur la Santé; Inserm (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale): Paris, France, 2013; pp. 22–34.
World Health Organization. The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2004; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
Dasgupta, S.; Meisner, C. Health Effects and Pesticide Perception as Determinants of Pesticide Use: Evidence from Bangladesh; World Bank Group: Bangladesh, South Africa, 2005.
Fleming, L.E.; Bean, J.A.; Rudolph, M.; Hamilton, K. Cancer incidence in a cohort of licensed pesticide applicators in Florida. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 1999, 41, 279–288. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Munnia, A.; Puntoni, R.; Merlo, F.; Parodi, S.; Peluso, M. Exposure to agrochemicals and DNA adducts in Western Liguria, Italy. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 1999, 34, 52–56. [CrossRef]
Bolognesi, C. Genotoxicity of pesticides: A review of human biomonitoring studies. Mutat. Res. 2003, 543, 251–272. [CrossRef]
Restrepo, M.; Munoz, N.; Day, N.E.; Parra, J.E.; de Romero, L.; Nguyen-Dinh, X. Prevalence of adverse reproductive outcomes in a population occupationally exposed to pesticides in Colombia. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1990, 16, 232–238. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lu, J.L. Risk factors to pesticide exposure and associated health symptoms among cut-flower farmers. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2005, 15, 161–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment for plant protection products. EFSA J. 2014, 12, 3874.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision U, Applicator Exposure Moniotoring; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA): Washington, DC, USA, 1986.
Brouwer, D.H.; Brouwer, R.; Mik, G.D.; Maas, C.L.; Hemmen, J.J.V. Pesticides in the cultivation of carnations in greenhouses: Part I—Exposure and concomitant health risk. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1992, 53, 575–581. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brouwer, R.; Brouwer, D.H.; Tijssen, S.C.; Hemmen, J.J.V. Pesticides in the cultivation of carnations in greenhouses: Part II—Relationship between foliar residues and exposures. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1992, 53, 582–587. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kangas, J.; Manninen, A.; Liesivuori, J. Occupational exposure to pesticides in Finland. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1995, 58, 423–429. [CrossRef]
Methner, M.M.; Fenske, R.A. Pesticide exposure during greenhouse applications. III. Variable exposure due to ventilation conditions and spray pressure. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 1996, 11, 174–180. [CrossRef]
Illing, H.P.A. Is working in greenhouses healthy? Evidence concerning the toxic risks that might affect greenhouse workers. Occup. Med. 1997, 47, 281–293. [CrossRef]
Ecobichon, D.J. Occupational Hazards of Pesticide Exposure: Sampling, Monitoring, Measuring; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1998.
Van Hemmen, J.J.; Brouwer, D.H. Assessment of dermal exposure to chemicals. Sci. Total Environ. 1995, 168, 131–141. [CrossRef]
Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah, R.; Roff, M.; Delgado, P.; Eriksson, K.; Fransman, W.; Gijsbers, J.H.J.; Van Hemmen, J.J. Patterns of dermal exposure to hazardous substances in European Union workplaces. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2004, 48, 285–297. [PubMed]
Lesmes-Fabian, C.; García-Santos, G.; Leuenberger, F.; Nuyttens, D.; Binder, C.R. Dermal exposure assessment of pesticide use: The case of sprayers in potato farms in the Colombian highlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 430, 202–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Agricultural Transfer Coefficients; Policy No 003.1 (dated August 7); Science Advisory Council for Exposure, Health Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Science Advisory Council for Exposure, Policy Number 12, Recommended Revisions to the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Residential Exposure Assessments; Office of Pesticide Programs, Health Effects Division: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
EU—Pesticides Database. Available online: ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/ public/?event=activesubstance.selection&language=EN (accessed on 1 March 2017).
Brouwer, R.; Marquart, H.; de Mik, G.; Van Hemmen, J.J. Risk assessment of dermal exposure of greenhouse workers to pesticides after re-entry. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1992, 23, 273–280. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Guidance Document for the Conduct of Studies of Occupational Exposure to Pesticides during Agricultural Application; OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment. OCDE/GD (97); Environmental Directorate: Paris, France, 1997.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC official method 2007.01 pesticide residues in Foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry first action 2007. J. AOAC Int. 2007, 90, 485–520.
European Commission. Guidance Document on Analytical Quality Control and Method Validation Procedures for Pesticides Residues Analysis in Food and Feed; SANTE/11945/2015; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015; p. 42.
Van Loco, J.; Beernaert, H. An alternative method validation strategy for the European Decision 2002/657/EC. In Proceedings of the Euro Food Chem XII: Strategies for Safe Food, Brugge, Belgium, 23–26 September 2003; Volume 1, pp. 91–94.
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Dermal Exposure Assessment: A Summary of EPA Approaches; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance on selected default values to be used by the EFSA Scientific Committee, Scientific Panels and Units in the absence of actual measured data. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2579.
AGP—List of Pesticides Evaluated by JMPS and JMPR. Available online: www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/ thematic-sitemap/theme/pests/lpe/en/ (accessed on 1 March 2017).
FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper Series. JMPR Reports. Available online: www.who.int/ foodsafety/publications/jmpr-reports/en/ (accessed on 1 March 2017).
Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR). Monographs & Evaluations. The International Programme on Chemical Safety Website. Available online: www.inchem.org/pages/jmpr.html (accessed on 1 March 2017).
European Commission. Regulation (EC). No. 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2009; p. 1355.
Popendorf, W.J.; Leffingwell, J.T. Regulating OP pesticide residues for farmworker protection. In Residue Reviews; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1982; pp. 125–201.
Nigg, H.N.; Stamper, J.H.; Queen, R.M. The development and use of a universal model to predict tree crop harvester pesticide exposure. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1984, 45, 182–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zweig, G.; Leffingwell, J.T.; Popendorf, W. The relationship between dermal pesticide exposure by fruit harvesters and dislodgeable foliar residues. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 1985, 20, 27–59. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Thongsinthusak, T.; Ross, J.; Fong, H.; Formoli, T.; Krieger, R. Estimation of Exposure of Persons in California to Pesticide Products That Contain Abamectin. HS-1567; California Department of Food and Agriculture: Sacramento, CA, USA, 1990.
McCurdy, S.A.; Hansen, M.E.; Weisskopf, C.P.; Lopez, R.L.; Schneider, F.; Spencer, J.; Schenker, M.B. Assessment of azinphos-methyl exposure in California peach harvest workers. Arch. Environ. Health Int. J. 1994, 49, 289–296. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Krieger, R.I.; Dinoff, T.M. Malathion deposition, metabolite clearance, and cholinesterase status of date dusters and harvesters in California. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 38, 546–553. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gomes, J.; Lloyd, O.L.; Revitt, D.M. The influence of personal protection, environmental hygiene and exposure to pesticides on the health of immigrant farm workers in a desert country. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 1999, 72, 40–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]