[en] In this article we make a case for recognizing deictification as a type of grammaticalization and semantic shift in the NP analogous to auxiliarization in the VP. The specific analogy we point out is between lexical verbs that grammaticalize into secondary auxiliaries bound by the finite, as in is going to, has to + verb, and lexically full adjectives that grammaticalize into postdeterminers bound by the primary determiner, as in a different, the same + noun. We present five case studies of the development of postdeterminer meanings, based on the analysis of diachronic and synchronic data. The adjectives studied are opposite, complete, old, regular and necessary, whose postdeterminer uses relate to the basic deictic systems of space, quantity, time and modality. Our analysis of the data shows that the mechanism of secondary deictification can be given a unified characterization as the semantic shift by which a general relation expressed by the adjective is given a subjective reference point in or relative to the speech event.
Disciplines :
Languages & linguistics
Author, co-author :
Davidse, Kristin; Univ Leuven, FWO Flanders Res Fdn, Louvain, Belgium.
Breban, Tine; Univ Leuven, FWO Flanders Res Fdn, Louvain, Belgium.
Adamson, Sylvia & Victorina González-Díaz. 2004. Back to the very beginning: The development of intensifies in ME-EModE. Presented at ICEHL 13, University of Vienna.
Bache, Carl. 2000. Essentials of mastering English: A concise grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18, 1-34.
Breban, Tine. 2002. Adjectives of comparison: Postdeterminer, epithet and classifier uses. MA dissertation, University of Leuven.
Breban, Tine. 2002/2003. The grammaticalization of the adjectives of identity and difference in English and Dutch. Languages in Contrast 4(1), 167-201.
Breban, Tine. 2006a. The grammaticalization of the English adjectives of comparison: A diachronic case study. In Roberta Facchinetti & Matti Rissanen (eds.), Corpus linguistic studies in diachronic English, 253-88. Bern: Peter Lang.
Breban, Tine. 2006b. Grammaticalization and subjectification of the English adjectives of general comparison. In Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity, 241-78. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Breban, Tine. 2006c. English adjectives of general comparison: Lexical versus grammaticalized uses. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.
Breban, Tine. Forthcoming. The grammaticalization and subjectification of English adjectives expressing difference into plurality/distributivity markers and quantifiers. Folia Linguistica.
Brinton, Laurel. 2002. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization reconsidered: On the 'late' use of temporal adverbs. In Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María José López-Couso (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology: Selected papers from 11 ICEHL, 67-97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brisard, Frank (ed.). 2002. Grounding: The epistemic footing ofdeixis and reference. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602-23. London: Blackwell.
Crain, Stephen & Henry Hamburger. 1992. Semantics, knowledge and NP modification. In Robert Levine (ed.), Formal grammar: Theory and implementation. Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, vol. 2, 372-401. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia Press.
Davidse, Kristin. 2004. The interaction of identification and quantification in English determiners. In Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture and mind, 507-33. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Davidse, Kristin, Lieselotte Brems & Liesbeth DeSmedt. 2008. Type noun uses in the English NP: A case of left-to-right layering. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(2), 139-68.
Declerck, Renaat. 2006. The grammar of the English verb phrase, vol. 1: The grammar of the English tense system: A comprehensive analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Denison, David. 2005. History of the sort of construction family. Presented at the Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki, 6-8 September 2002. Updated version available on www.llc.manchester. ac.uk/SubjectAreas/Linguistics English Language/AcademicStaff/DavidDenison/.
Denison, David. 2006. Category change and gradience in the determiner system. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 279-304. Oxford: Blackwell.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2005. A corpus of late modern English texts. ICAME-Journal 29, 69-82.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Evans, Nick & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind's ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76, 546-92.
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 2: 1066-1476, 207-408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.
Heytens, Charlotte, Hanne Pirlet & Thomas Van Parys. 2004. The lexicalisation and grammaticalisation of the premodifying adjectives old, complete and pure. Term paper, University of Leuven.
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2002a. Deixis and subjectivity. In Brisard (ed.), 1-27.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2002b. Remarks on the English grounding systems. In Brisard (ed.), 29-38.
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20, 303-18.
Matthews, Peter. 1997. The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nuyts, Jan. 2005. The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In Alex Klinge & Henrik Høeg-Müller (eds.), Modality: Studies inform and function, 5-38. London: Equinox.
Oxford English dictionary, 1933. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Palmer, Frank. 1990. Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.
Paradis, Carita. 2000. Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalization. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg & C. B. McCully (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies, 233-58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Sanford, Anthony & Simon Garrod. 1998. The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes 26, 159-90.
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, John et al. (eds.). 1990. The Collins COBUILD English grammar. London: Collins.
Tallir, Tinneke. 2000. The postdeterminer: A corpus-based investigation. MA dissertation, University of Leuven.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65, 31-55.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van linden, An & Kristin Davidse. 2005. Degrees of subjectivity of prenominai adjectives: Diachronic change, linear order, and constructional relations as determining factors. Presented at FITIGRA, University of Leuven.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1505-28.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2007. Rethinking the coordinate-subordinate dichotomy. Interpersonal grammar and the analysis of adverbial clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1997. Understanding English grammar: A linguistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.