common bean; local adaptation; genetic diversity; microevolution; Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers; crop diversity; organic farming
Abstract :
[en] Recognizing both the stakes of traditional European common bean diversity and the role
farmers’ and gardeners’ networks play in maintaining this diversity, the present study examines
the role that local adaptation plays for the management of common bean diversity in situ. To the purpose, four historical bean varieties and one modern control were multiplied on two organic farms for three growing seasons. The fifteen resulting populations, the initial ones and two populations of each variety obtained after the three years of multiplication, were then grown in a common garden. Twenty-two Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers and 13 phenotypic traits were assessed. In total, 68.2% of tested markers were polymorphic and a total of 66 different alleles were identified. FST analysis showed that the genetic composition of two varieties multiplied in different environments changed. At the phenotypic level, differences were observed in flowering date and leaf length. Results indicate that three years of multiplication suffice for local adaptation to occur. The spatial dynamics of genetic and phenotypic bean diversity imply that the maintenance of diversity should be considered at the scale of the network, rather than individual farms and gardens. The microevolution of bean populations within networks of gardens and farms emerges as a research perspective.
Singh, S.P.; Gutiérrez, J.A.; Molina, A.; Urrea, C.; Gepts, P. Genetic Diversity in Cultivated Common Bean: II. Marker-Based Analysis of Morphological and Agronomic Traits. Crop Sci. 1991, 31, 23. [CrossRef]
Kwak, M.; Gepts, P. Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 118, 979-992. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gepts, P.; Kmiecik, K.; Pereira, P.; Bliss, F.A. Dissemination pathways of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) deduced from phaseolin electrophoretic variability. I. The Americas. Econ. Bot. 1988, 42, 73-85. [CrossRef]
Zewen, A.C. The introduction of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) into Western Europe and the phenotypic variation of dry beans collected in The Netherlands in 1946. Euphytica 1997, 94, 319-328.
Maras, M.; Šuštar-Vozlič, J.; Kainz, W.; Meglič, V. Genetic Diversity and Dissemination Pathways of Common Bean in Central Europe. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2013, 138, 297-305.
Gioia, T.; Logozzo, G.; Attene, G.; Bellucci, E.; Benedettelli, S.; Negri, V.; Papa, R.; Spagnoletti Zeuli, P. Evidence for Introduction Bottleneck and Extensive Inter-Gene Pool (Mesoamerica × Andes) Hybridization in the European Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Germplasm. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75974. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Angioi, S.A.; Rau, D.; Attene, G.; Nanni, L.; Bellucci, E.; Logozzo, G.; Negri, V.; Spagnoletti Zeuli, P.L.; Papa, R. Beans in Europe: Origin and structure of the European landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121, 829-843. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Production and Trade Data. Available online: http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E (accessed on 6 May 2016).
European Commission International Trade Statistics. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/international-trade/data/database (accessed on 5 June 2016).
Unilet. Union Nationale Interprofessionnelle des Légumes Transformés; Unilet Infos: Paris, France, 2015; pp. 28-31.
Kastler, G. Les Semences Paysannes: Situation Actuelle, Difficultés Techniques, Besoin d’un Cadre Juridique. Les Dossiers de l’environnement de l’INRA 2006, 30, 53-56. (In Franch)
Bocci, R.; Chable, V. Peasant seeds in Europe: Stakes and prospects. J. Agric. Environ. Int. Dev. 2009. [CrossRef]
Brouwer, B.O.; Murphy, K.M.; Jones, S.S. Plant breeding for local food systems: A contextual review of end-use selection for small grains and dry beans inWesternWashington. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2015, 31, 1-13.
Sánchez, E.; Sifres, A.; Casañas, F.; Nuez, F. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces in Catalonia, a Mesoamerican germplasm hotspot to be preserved. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 529-534. [CrossRef]
Thomas, M.; Demeulenaere, E.; Dawson, J.C.; Khan, A.R.; Galic, N.; Jouanne-Pin, S.; Remoue, C.; Bonneuil, C.; Goldringer, I. On-farm dynamic management of genetic diversity: The impact of seed diffusions and seed saving practices on a population-variety of bread wheat: On-farm crop metapopulation of bread wheat. Evol. Appl. 2012, 5, 779-795. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Morgante, M.; Oliveiri, M. PCR-amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics. Plant J. 1993, 3, 175-182. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yu, K.; Park, S.J.; Poysa, V. Abundance and variation of microsatellite DNA sequences in beans (Phaseolus and Vigna). Genome 1999, 42, 27-34. [CrossRef]
Gaitán-Solís, E.; Duque, M.C.; Edwards, K.J.; Tohme, J. Microsatellite Repeats in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Crop Sci. 2002, 42, 2128-2136. [CrossRef]
Blair, M.W.; Torres, M.M.; Pedraza, F.; Giraldo, M.C.; Buendía, H.F.; Hurtado, N. Development of microsatellite markers for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on screening of non-enriched, small-insert genomic libraries. Genome 2009, 52, 772-782. [PubMed]
Córdoba, J.M.; Chavarro, C.; Rojas, F.; Muñoz, C.; Blair, M.W. Identification and Mapping of Simple Sequence Repeat Markers from Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Bacterial Artificial Chromosome End Sequences for Genome Characterization and Genetic-Physical Map Integration. Plant Genome J. 2010, 3, 154. [CrossRef]
Blair, M.W.; Pedraza, F.; Buendia, H.F.; Gaitán-Solís, E.; Beebe, S.E.; Gepts, P.; Tohme, J. Development of a genome-wide anchored microsatellite map for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 107, 1362-1374. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Blair, M.W.; Díaz, L.M.; Buendía, H.F.; Duque, M.C. Genetic diversity, seed size associations and population structure of a core collection of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 955-972. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Thomas, M.; Thépot, S.; Galic, N.; Jouanne-Pin, S.; Remoué, C.; Goldringer, I. Diversifying mechanisms in the on-farm evolution of crop mixtures. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 2937-2954. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Raggi, L.; Ceccarelli, S.; Negri, V. Evolution of a barley composite cross-derived population: An insight gained by molecular markers. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 154, 23-39. [CrossRef]
Tiranti, B.; Negri, V. Selective microenvironmental effects play a role in shaping genetic diversity and structure in a Phaseolus vulgaris L. landrace: Implications for on-farm conservation. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 4942-4955. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Serpolay, E.; Goldringer, I.; Negri, V.; Raggi, L.; Tissi, C.; Chable, V. On-farm breeding of bean populations, an approach of genetic diversity evolution. In Shaping the Future of Agriculture: The Role of Diversity in Lowinput and Organic Cropping Systems, Proceedings of the SOLIBAM 1st Stakeholder Congress, Rome, Italy, 19-20 April 2012; Grottaferrata: Rome, Italy, 2012.
Horneburg, B.; Becker, H.C. Crop Adaptation in On-Farm Management by Natural and Conscious Selection: A Case Study with Lentil. Crop Sci. 2008, 48, 203. [CrossRef]
Dawson, J.C.; Serpolay, E.; Giuliano, S.; Schermann, N.; Galic, N.; Berthellot, J.-F.; Chesneau, V.; Ferté, H.; Mercier, F.; Osman, A.; et al. Phenotypic diversity and evolution of farmer varieties of bread wheat on organic farms in Europe. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 145-163. [CrossRef]
Rhoné, B.; Vitalis, R.; Goldringer, I.; Bonnin, I. Evolution of flowering time in experimental wheat populations: A comprehensive approach to detect genetic signatures of natural selection. Evolution 2010, 64, 2110-2115. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bitocchi, E.; Bellucci, E.; Giardini, A.; Rau, D.; Rodriguez, M.; Biagetti, E.; Santilocchi, R.; Spagnoletti Zeuli, P.; Gioia, T.; Logozzo, G.; et al. Molecular analysis of the parallel domestication of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Mesoamerica and the Andes. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 300-313. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Allard, R.W. The mating system and microevolution. Genetics 1975, 79, 115-126. [PubMed]
Ibarra-Perez, F.J.; Ehdaie, B.; Waines, J.G. Estimation of Outcrossing Rate in Common Bean. Crop Sci. 1997, 37, 60-65. [CrossRef]
Martins, G.B.; Adams, M.W. Landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in Northern Malawi. II. Generation and maintenance of variability. Econ. Bot. 1987, 204-215. [CrossRef]
Serpolay, E.; Schermann, N.; Dawson, J.; van Bueren, E.T.L.; Goldringer, I.; Chable, V. Phenotypic Changes in Different Spinach Varieties Grown and Selected under Organic Conditions. Sustainability 2011, 3, 1616-1636. [CrossRef]
Serpolay-Besson, E.; Giuliano, S.; Schermann, N.; Chable, V. Evaluation of Evolution and Diversity of Maize Open-Pollinated Varieties Cultivated under Contrasted Environmental and Farmers’ Selection Pressures: A Phenotypical Approach. Open J. Genet. 2014, 4, 125-145. [CrossRef]
Joshi, J.; Schmid, B.; Caldeira, M.C.; Dimitrakopoulos, P.G.; Good, J.; Harris, R.; Hector, A.; Huss-Danell, K.; Jumpponen, A.; Minns, A.; et al. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4, 536-544. [CrossRef]
Leimu, R.; Fischer, M. A Meta-Analysis of Local Adaptation in Plants. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e4010. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dudley, S.A. The Response to Differing Selection on Plant Physiological Traits: Evidence for Local Adaptation. Evolution 1996, 50, 103. [CrossRef]
Lacey, E.R. What is an adaptive environmentally induced parental effect? In Maternal Effects as Adaptations; Mousseau, T.A., Fox, C.W., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998.
Galloway, L.F. Maternal effects provide phenotypic adaptation to local environmental conditions: Research review. New Phytol. 2005, 166, 93-100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sadras, V.O. Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100, 125-138. [CrossRef]
Klaedtke, S.; Jacques, M.-A.; Raggi, L.; Préveaux, A.; Bonneau, S.; Negri, V.; Chable, V.; Barret, M. Terroir is a key driver of seed-associated microbial assemblages. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1792-1804. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mendes, R.; Kruijt, M.; de Bruijn, I.; Dekkers, E.; van der Voort, M.; Schneider, J.H.M.; Piceno, Y.M.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Andersen, G.L.; Bakker, P.A.H.M.; et al. Deciphering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Disease-Suppressive Bacteria. Science 2011, 332, 1097-1100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Thomas, M. Gestion Dynamique à la Ferme de L’agrobiodiversité: Relation Entre la Structure des Populations de blé Tendre et les Pratiques Humaines; Université Paris Diderot, Paris 7: Paris, France, 2011.
Negri, V.; Tiranti, B. Effectiveness of in situ and ex situ conservation of crop diversity. What a Phaseolus vulgaris L. landrace case study can tell us. Genetica 2010, 138, 985-998. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nelson, G.C.; Rosegrant, M.W.; Koo, J.; Robertson, R.; Sulser, T.; Zhu, T.; Ringler, C.; Msangi, S.; Palazzo, A.; Batka, M.; et al. Climate Change: Impact on Agriculture and Costs of Adaptation; International Food Policy Research Institute, Ed.; Food Policy Report; International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
Enjalbert, J.; Dawson, J.C.; Paillard, S.; Rhoné, B.; Rousselle, Y.; Thomas, M.; Goldringer, I. Dynamic management of crop diversity: From an experimental approach to on-farm conservation. C. R. Biol. 2011, 334, 458-468. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Soliman, K.M.; Allard, R.W. Grain Yield of Composite Cross Populations of Barley: Effects of Natural Selection. Crop Sci. 1991, 31, 705-708. [CrossRef]
Soleri, D.; Smith, S.E. Morphological and Phenological Comparisons of Two Hopi Maize Varieties Conserved in situ and ex situ. Econ. Bot. 1995, 49, 56-77. [CrossRef]
Rice, E.; Smale, M.; Blanco, J.-L. Farmers’ Use of Improved Seed Selection Practices in Mexican Maize: Evidence and Issues from the Sierra de Santa Marta. World Dev. 1998, 26, 165-1640. [CrossRef]
Tin, H.; Berg, T.; Bjørnstad, Å. Diversity and adaptation in rice varieties under static (ex situ) and dynamic (in situ) management. Euphytica 2001, 122, 491-502. [CrossRef]
Gómez, O.J.; Blair, M.W.; Frankow-Lindberg, B.E.; Gullberg, U. Comparative Study of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Landraces Conserved ex situ in Genebanks and in situ by Farmers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2005, 52, 371-380. [CrossRef]
Bradshaw, A.D. Ecological significance of genetic variation between populations. In Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology; Dirzo, R., Sarukhan, J., Eds.; Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 1984; pp. 213-228.
Gallagher, J.L.; Somers, G.F.; Grant, D.M.; Seliskar, D.M. Persistent Differences in Two Forms of Spartina Alterniflora: A Common Garden Experiment. Ecology 1988, 69, 1005-1008. [CrossRef]
Vilmorin-Andrieux et Cie. Description des Plantes Potagères; Vilmorin: Paris, France, 1855.
Vilmorin-Andrieux, S.A. Dictionnaire Vilmorin des Plantes Potagères; Vilmorin: Paris, France, 1947.
Raggi, L.; Tissi, C.; Mazzucato, A.; Negri, V. Molecular polymorphism related to flowering trait variation in a Phaseolus vulgaris L. collection. Plant Sci. 2014, 215-216, 180-189. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Van Loon, E.; Davis, S. The ARES Package. R Package Version 1.2-2. Available online: http://ftp.unibayreuth.de/math/statlib/R/CRAN/doc/packages/ARES.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2017).
Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. genalex 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 288-295. [CrossRef]
VIB/UGent Calculate and Draw Custom Venn Diagrams. Available online: http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/ (accessed on 12 December 2016).
Conner, J.K.; Hartl, D.L. A Primer of Ecological Genetics; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2004.
Excoffier, L.; Lischer, H.E.L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 564-567. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945-959. [PubMed]
Gao, H.; Williamson, S.; Bustamante, C.D. An MCMC Approach for Joint Inference of Population Structure and Inbreeding Rates from Multi-Locus Genotype Data. Genetics 2007, 176, 1635-1651. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611-2620. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Earl, D.A.; Von Holdt, B.M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2012, 4, 359-361. [CrossRef]
Rosenberg, N.A. Distruct: A program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4, 137-138. [CrossRef]
International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IPGRI). Phaseolus Vulgaris Descriptors; International Board for Plant Genetic Resources: Rome, Italy, 1982.
Van Schoonhoven, A.; Pastor-Corrales, M.A.; Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical. Standard System for the Evaluation of Bean Germplasm; Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical: Cali, Colombia, 1987.
Collmer, C.W.; Marston, M.F.; Taylor, J.C.; Jahn, M. The I Gene of Bean: A Dosage-Dependent Allele Conferring Extreme Resistance, Hypersensitive Resistance, or Spreading Vascular Necrosis in Response to the Potyvirus Bean common mosaic virus. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. 2000, 13, 1266-1270. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Development Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2016.
Pinheiro, J.C.; Bates, D.M.; DebRoy, S. R-Core Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-131. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (accessed on 6 February 2017).
Fang, L.; Loughin, T.M. Analyzing binomial data in a split-plot design: Classical approaches or modern techniques? In 16th Annual Conference Proceedings, Paper 16; Kansas State University Libraries, New Prairie Press: Hale, TX, USA, 2004.
Shah, D.A.; Madden, L.V. Nonparametric Analysis of Ordinal Data in Designed Factorial Experiments. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 33-43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Konietschke, F.; Friedrich, S.; Brunner, E.; Pauly, M. RankFD: Rank-Based Tests for General Factorial Designs. R package version 0.0.0.2. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rankFD (accessed on 28 June 2016).