Article (Scientific journals)
Bioinformatic analyses in early host response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSV) reveals pathway differences between pigs with alternate genotypes for a major host response QTL
Schroyen, Martine; Eisley, C.; Koltes, J. E. et al.
2016In BMC Genomics, 17 (1)
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
12864_2016_Article_2547.pdf
Publisher postprint (2.78 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
GBP5; Homeostasis; Ion transport; Pig; PRRS virus; Regulatory factors; RNA-seq; WUR
Abstract :
[en] Background: A region on Sus scrofa chromosome 4 (SSC4) surrounding single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker WUR10000125 (WUR) has been reported to be strongly associated with both weight gain and serum viremia in pigs after infection with PRRS virus (PRRSV). A proposed causal mutation in the guanylate binding protein 5 gene (GBP5) is predicted to truncate the encoded protein. To investigate transcriptional differences between WUR genotypes in early host response to PRRSV infection, an RNA-seq experiment was performed on globin depleted whole blood RNA collected on 0, 4, 7, 10 and 14 days post-infection (dpi) from eight littermate pairs with one AB (favorable) and one AA (unfavorable) WUR genotype animal per litter. Results: Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of transcripts that were differentially expressed (DE) between dpi across both genotypes revealed an inflammatory response for all dpi when compared to day 0. However, at the early time points of 4 and 7dpi, several GO terms had higher enrichment scores compared to later dpi, including inflammatory response (p < 10-7), specifically regulation of NFkappaB (p < 0.01), cytokine, and chemokine activity (p < 0.01). At 10 and 14dpi, GO term enrichment indicated a switch to DNA damage response, cell cycle checkpoints, and DNA replication. Few transcripts were DE between WUR genotypes on individual dpi or averaged over all dpi, and little enrichment of any GO term was found. However, there were differences in expression patterns over time between AA and AB animals, which was confirmed by genotype-specific expression patterns of several modules that were identified in weighted gene co-expression network analyses (WGCNA). Minor differences between AA and AB animals were observed in immune response and DNA damage response (p = 0.64 and p = 0.11, respectively), but a significant effect between genotypes pointed to a difference in ion transport/homeostasis and the participation of G-coupled protein receptors (p = 8e-4), which was reinforced by results from regulatory and phenotypic impact factor analyses between genotypes. Conclusion: We propose these pathway differences between WUR genotypes are the result of the inability of the truncated GBP5 of the AA genotyped pigs to inhibit viral entry and replication as quickly as the intact GBP5 protein of the AB genotyped pigs. © 2016 Schroyen et al.
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry
Author, co-author :
Schroyen, Martine   ;  Université de Liège > Agronomie, Bio-ingénierie et Chimie (AgroBioChem) > Zootechnie
Eisley, C. ;  Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, 1121 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA, United States
Koltes, J. E.;  Department of Animal Science, University of Arkansas, AFLS B106D, Fayetteville, AR, United States
Fritz-Waters, E.;  Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 2255 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, United States
Choi, I.;  USDA-ARS, BARC, APDL, Bldg.1040, Beltsville, MD, United States
Plastow, G. S.;  Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Guan, L.;  Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Stothard, P.;  Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Bao, H.;  Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Kommadath, A.;  Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Reecy, J. M.;  Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 2255 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, United States
Lunney, J. K.;  USDA-ARS, BARC, APDL, Bldg.1040, Beltsville, MD, United States
Rowland, R. R. R.;  College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, K-231 Mosier Hall, Manhattan, KS, United States
Dekkers, J. C. M.;  Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 2255 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, United States
Tuggle, C. K.;  Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 2255 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, United States
More authors (5 more) Less
 These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Title :
Bioinformatic analyses in early host response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSV) reveals pathway differences between pigs with alternate genotypes for a major host response QTL
Publication date :
2016
Journal title :
BMC Genomics
eISSN :
1471-2164
Publisher :
BioMed Central Ltd.
Volume :
17
Issue :
1
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 24 April 2017

Statistics


Number of views
91 (8 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
115 (2 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
24
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
16
OpenCitations
 
23

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi