Article (Scientific journals)
In-depth study of 16CygB using inversion techniques
Buldgen, Gaël; Salmon, Sébastien; Reese, D. R. et al.
2016In Astronomy and Astrophysics, 596
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
1608.05546v1.pdf
Author preprint (757.01 kB)
arxiv version
Download

The journal postprint version is available at: http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2016/12/aa28773-16/aa28773-16.html


All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
stars: interiors; stars: oscillations; stars: fundamental parameters; asteroseismology
Abstract :
[en] Context. The 16Cyg binary system hosts the solar-like Kepler targets with the most stringent observational constraints. Indeed, we benefit from very high quality oscillation spectra, as well as spectroscopic and interferometric observations. Moreover, this system is particularly interesting since both stars are very similar in mass but the A component is orbited by a red dwarf, whereas the B component is orbited by a Jovian planet and thus could have formed a more complex planetary system. In our previous study, we showed that seismic inversions of integrated quantities could be used to constrain microscopic diffusion in the A component. In this study, we analyse the B component in the light of a more regularised inversion. <BR /> Aims: We wish to analyse independently the B component of the 16Cyg binary system using the inversion of an indicator dedicated to analyse core conditions, denoted t[SUB]u[/SUB]. Using this independent determination, we wish to analyse any differences between both stars due to the potential influence of planetary formation on stellar structure and/or their respective evolution. <BR /> Methods: First, we recall the observational constraints for 16CygB and the method we used to generate reference stellar models of this star. We then describe how we improved the inversion and how this approach could be used for future targets with a sufficient number of observed frequencies. The inversion results were then used to analyse the differences between the A and B components. <BR /> Results: The inversion of the t[SUB]u[/SUB] indicator for 16CygB shows a disagreement with models including microscopic diffusion and sharing the chemical composition previously derived for 16CygA. We show that small changes in chemical composition are insufficient to solve the problem but that extra mixing can account for the differences seen between both stars. We use a parametric approach to analyse the impact of extra mixing in the form of turbulent diffusion on the behaviour of the t[SUB]u[/SUB] values. We conclude on the necessity of further investigations using models with a physically motivated implementation of extra mixing processes including additional constraints to further improve the accuracy with which the fundamental parameters of this system are determined.
Disciplines :
Space science, astronomy & astrophysics
Author, co-author :
Buldgen, Gaël ;  Université de Liège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Astrophysique stellaire théorique et astérosismologie
Salmon, Sébastien ;  Université de Liège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Astrophysique stellaire théorique et astérosismologie
Reese, D. R.;  LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195, Meudon Cedex, France
Dupret, Marc-Antoine ;  Université de Liège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Astrophysique stellaire théorique et astérosismologie
Language :
English
Title :
In-depth study of 16CygB using inversion techniques
Publication date :
01 December 2016
Journal title :
Astronomy and Astrophysics
ISSN :
0004-6361
eISSN :
1432-0746
Publisher :
EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France
Volume :
596
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 03 January 2017

Statistics


Number of views
54 (3 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
98 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
18
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
4
OpenCitations
 
16

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi