Article (Scientific journals)
Comparison of a simple clinical risk index and quantitative bone ultrasound for identifying women at increased risk of osteoporosis
Kung, A. W. C.; Ho, A. Y. Y.; Ben Sedrine, W. et al.
2003In Osteoporosis International, 14 (9), p. 716-721
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Comparison of a simple clinical risk index and quantitative bone ultrasound for identifying women at increased risk of osteoporosis.pdf
Publisher postprint (182.01 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Asia; bone ultrasound; clinical risk index
Abstract :
[en] Osteoporosis is a growing problem in Asia, and early identification of at risk subjects for preventive measures is likely the most cost-effective method for managing this disease in developing countries. Patients with low bone mineral density (BMD) have a high risk of future fracture. However, access to BMD measurements is limited in many areas of Asia, and inexpensive methods of targeting high-risk patients for BMD measurements would be valuable. We compared two methods, a simple clinical risk assessment tool, the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), and quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in identifying subjects with low BMD by DXA in 722 southern Chinese postmenopausal women recruited from the community in Hong Kong. Using the published cutoff value of -1 (versus 0 or higher) for OSTA to identify subjects with femoral neck BMD T-score less than or equal to-2.5, basing on our local population peak young mean value, the sensitivity and specificity was 88% and 54% respectively. The optimal cutoff T-score of -2.35 for QUS yielded sensitivity and specificity values of 81% and 65%, respectively. The AUC for QUS was 0.78, which was not significantly different from that of 0.80 for OSTA. Both OSTA and QUS correlated significantly with BMD at the femoral neck (0.62 and 0.36, respectively, P both <0.001). When these cut-off values were used to identify subjects with either lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD T-score less than or equal to-2.5, the sensitivity and specificity was 79% and 60%, respectively, for OSTA, and 69% and 70%, respectively, for QUS. Combining QUS with OSTA improved the sensitivity to 91%, but the specificity was reduced to 44%. We conclude that the simple clinical risk assessment tool OSTA is a free and effective method for identifying subjects at increased risk of osteoporosis, and its use could facilitate the appropriate and more cost-effective use of bone densitometry in developing countries.
Disciplines :
Endocrinology, metabolism & nutrition
Author, co-author :
Kung, A. W. C.
Ho, A. Y. Y.
Ben Sedrine, W.
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Epidémiologie et santé publique
Ross, P. D.
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of a simple clinical risk index and quantitative bone ultrasound for identifying women at increased risk of osteoporosis
Publication date :
September 2003
Journal title :
Osteoporosis International
ISSN :
0937-941X
eISSN :
1433-2965
Publisher :
Springer-Verlag London Ltd, Godalming, United Kingdom
Volume :
14
Issue :
9
Pages :
716-721
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 30 November 2009

Statistics


Number of views
76 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
49
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
43
OpenCitations
 
39

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi