Article (Scientific journals)
Targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C versus 36 degrees C after cardiac arrest.
Nielsen, Niklas; Wetterslev, Jorn; Cronberg, Tobias et al.
2013In New England Journal of Medicine, 369 (23), p. 2197-206
 

Files


Full Text
NEJM TTM 2013.pdf
Author postprint (497.41 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Adult; Aged; Body Temperature; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypothermia, Induced; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/complications/mortality/therapy; Treatment Failure; Unconsciousness/etiology; Withholding Treatment
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: Unconscious survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have a high risk of death or poor neurologic function. Therapeutic hypothermia is recommended by international guidelines, but the supporting evidence is limited, and the target temperature associated with the best outcome is unknown. Our objective was to compare two target temperatures, both intended to prevent fever. METHODS: In an international trial, we randomly assigned 950 unconscious adults after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause to targeted temperature management at either 33 degrees C or 36 degrees C. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality through the end of the trial. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neurologic function or death at 180 days, as evaluated with the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale and the modified Rankin scale. RESULTS: In total, 939 patients were included in the primary analysis. At the end of the trial, 50% of the patients in the 33 degrees C group (235 of 473 patients) had died, as compared with 48% of the patients in the 36 degrees C group (225 of 466 patients) (hazard ratio with a temperature of 33 degrees C, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.28; P=0.51). At the 180-day follow-up, 54% of the patients in the 33 degrees C group had died or had poor neurologic function according to the CPC, as compared with 52% of patients in the 36 degrees C group (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16; P=0.78). In the analysis using the modified Rankin scale, the comparable rate was 52% in both groups (risk ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.14; P=0.87). The results of analyses adjusted for known prognostic factors were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In unconscious survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause, hypothermia at a targeted temperature of 33 degrees C did not confer a benefit as compared with a targeted temperature of 36 degrees C. (Funded by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and others; TTM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01020916.).
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Nielsen, Niklas
Wetterslev, Jorn
Cronberg, Tobias
Erlinge, David
Gasche, Yvan
Hassager, Christian
Horn, Janneke
Hovdenes, Jan
Kjaergaard, Jesper
Kuiper, Michael
Pellis, Tommaso
Stammet, Pascal ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Doct. sc. médicales (Bologne)
Wanscher, Michael
Wise, Matt P.
Aneman, Anders
Al-Subaie, Nawaf
Boesgaard, Soren
Bro-Jeppesen, John
Brunetti, Iole
Bugge, Jan Frederik
Hingston, Christopher D.
Juffermans, Nicole P.
Koopmans, Matty
Kober, Lars
Langorgen, Jorund
Lilja, Gisela
Moller, Jacob Eifer
Rundgren, Malin
Rylander, Christian
Smid, Ondrej
Werer, Christophe
Winkel, Per
Friberg, Hans
More authors (23 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C versus 36 degrees C after cardiac arrest.
Publication date :
2013
Journal title :
New England Journal of Medicine
ISSN :
0028-4793
eISSN :
1533-4406
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, United States - Massachusetts
Volume :
369
Issue :
23
Pages :
2197-206
Available on ORBi :
since 24 March 2016

Statistics


Number of views
395 (3 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
690 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
2177
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1900
OpenCitations
 
1859

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi