Article (Scientific journals)
New developments in inhaler devices within pharmaceutical companies: A systematic review of the impact on clinical outcomes and patient preferences
Ninane, Vincent; Vandevoorde, Jan; Cataldo, Didier et al.
2015In Respiratory Medicine, 109, p. 1430-1438
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Ninane Respir Med 2015 - Inhaler devices .pdf
Publisher postprint (237.58 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Asthma; Dry powder inhaler; Respimat; Inhaler device; Inhalation therapy; Systematic review
Abstract :
[en] Background: Pharmaceutical companies offer an increasing number of inhaler devices, whether or not together with new substances, for maintenance treatment of patients with COPD or asthma. However, well-designed studies to support these developments are scarce. Objectives: The aim of this research was to evaluate how far new developments of inhaler devices are scientifically supported and translate into improvements of patient preferences and/or clinical outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to retrieve randomised controlled trials in patients with COPD or asthma that studied the in-company evolution of inhaler devices. Results were tabulated and discussed. Results: A total of 30 studies were found comparing Respimat® vs. HandiHaler®, Diskus®(Accuhaler®) vs. Diskhaler®(Rotadisk®) or pMDI, Ellipta® vs. Diskus®(Accuhaler®), Nexthaler® vs. pMDI, or Breezhaler® vs. Aerolizer®. These studies show that developments of inhaler devices may improve patient satisfaction but do not lead to demonstrable improvements in clinical efficacy. Current changes of devices are most commonly parallelled by changes in administration frequency towards once daily treatment. The only well-documented effect was found for the Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler, which realises a more than 3- fold lowering of the once-daily tiotropium dose through increased performance of the inhaler device. There are however, no data on clinical efficacy or safety comparing the two devices at the same dosage. Conclusions: Future developments of inhaler devices should all require well-designed studies to demonstrate patient benefit.
Disciplines :
Rheumatology
Author, co-author :
Ninane, Vincent
Vandevoorde, Jan
Cataldo, Didier  ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Labo de biologie des tumeurs et du développement
Derom, Eric
Liistro, Guiseppe
Munghen, Evert
Peché, Rudy
Schlesser, Marc
Verleden, Geert
Vincken, Walter
Language :
English
Title :
New developments in inhaler devices within pharmaceutical companies: A systematic review of the impact on clinical outcomes and patient preferences
Publication date :
2015
Journal title :
Respiratory Medicine
ISSN :
0954-6111
eISSN :
1532-3064
Publisher :
W.B. Saunders, London, United Kingdom
Volume :
109
Pages :
1430-1438
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 15 February 2016

Statistics


Number of views
42 (4 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
20
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
20
OpenCitations
 
14

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi