Article (Scientific journals)
Is it valid to measure suicidal ideation by depression rating scales?
Desseilles, Martin; Perroud, Nader; Guillaume, Sebastien et al.
2012In Journal of Affective Disorders, 136 (3), p. 398-404
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
1-s2_0-S0165032711007269-main.pdf
Publisher postprint (436.54 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Sectional Studies; Depression/diagnosis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Suicidal Ideation; Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data; Young Adult
Abstract :
[en] OBJECTIVE: To date, most researchers rely on suicidal items of scales primarily designed to measure depression severity to capture suicidal ideation (SI). This study aims at investigating how well the suicide item of the clinician rated Hamilton Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and principal factors derived from this scale correlate with SI scores derived from a well validated measure of SI: the Beck's scale for SI (SSI). METHOD: 281 suicide attempters consecutively hospitalized between 2007 and 2009 were assessed by using the SSI, the HAM-D and the self-report Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was computed to extract main factors. Correlations between these factors, BDI's and HAM-D's suicide items and the SSI scores were then computed. RESULTS: Three components were derived from the PCA. Factor 2 showed a major loading for the HAM-D suicide item. Both the HAM-D suicide item and Factor 2 positively correlated with the SSI total score (both p<0.00001). Moreover, the BDI suicide item highly correlated with the Factor 2 (p<0.001) and the SSI total score (p<0.00001). Finally, the HAM-D suicide item correlated significantly with the number of suicide attempts (p=0.0001) and the age at the first attempt (p=0.002). LIMITATIONS: Our sample was heterogeneous and future studies should refine the taxonomy of the suicidal behavior in specific sub-populations. The study design was cross-sectional and replication in a prospective study is needed. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the use of a single suicide item or a dimensional factor derived from a depression scale might be a valid approach to assess the suicidal ideations. Moreover, the results suggest that clinician rated scales as well as self-report questionnaires are equally valid to do so.
Disciplines :
Psychiatry
Author, co-author :
Desseilles, Martin ;  Université de Liège - ULiège
Perroud, Nader
Guillaume, Sebastien
Jaussent, Isabelle
Genty, Catherine
Malafosse, Alain
Courtet, Philippe
Language :
English
Title :
Is it valid to measure suicidal ideation by depression rating scales?
Publication date :
2012
Journal title :
Journal of Affective Disorders
ISSN :
0165-0327
eISSN :
1573-2517
Publisher :
Elsevier, Netherlands
Volume :
136
Issue :
3
Pages :
398-404
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Commentary :
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Available on ORBi :
since 14 January 2016

Statistics


Number of views
173 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1123 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
155
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
136
OpenCitations
 
132

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi