Reference : Working group 3- Identification of non-linear systems
Scientific journals : Other
Engineering, computing & technology : Mechanical engineering
Working group 3- Identification of non-linear systems
Golinval, Jean-Claude mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > LTAS - Vibrations et identification des structures >]
Kerschen, Gaëtan mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Laboratoire de structures et systèmes spatiaux >]
Lenaerts, V. [Université de Liège - ULg > Department of Aerospace, Mechanics and Materials > LTAS- Vibrations et identification des structures > >]
Thouverez, F. [>Ecole Centrale de Lyon, , > > > > Laboratoire de Méecanique > >]
Argoul, P. [>ENPC > > > > Laboratory of Material Analysis and Identification > >]
Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing
Academic Press Ltd Elsevier Science Ltd
Yes (verified by ORBi)
[en] structural dynamics ; diagnostics ; modelling non-linearity
[en] Researchers in structural dynamics have long recognised the importance of diagnosing and
modelling non-linearity. The last 20 years have witnessed a shift in emphasis from single
degree-of-freedom (sdof) to multi-degree-of-freedom (mdof) non-linear structural
dynamics. The main feature of the program of COST F3 Working Group 3 was to
identify the behaviour of a structure which exhibits a localised non-linear component.
Inside this working group, two benchmarks were defined and studied intensively, thereby
allowing to evaluate different identification methods and compare their efficiency and
specificity. For this purpose, a large amount of data (time and frequency measurements)
was collected and proposed to COST F3 participants. The two benchmarks that are
described in the following are:
* The VTT benchmark proposed by M. Juntunen from the VTT Technical Research of
* The ECL benchmark proposed by F. Thouverez from the Ecole Centrale de Lyon
The VTT benchmark is essentially one-dimensional but with a type of non-linearity that is
not known a priori. This is different from the ECL benchmark designed to implement a
cubic stiffness hardening but which address mdof systems. The ECL benchmark was
challenging in the sense that the considered structure is continuous and that several modes
participate in the response.
*Supported by a grant from the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research.
# 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
available online at

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

Restricted access
08a_mssp.pdfNo commentaryPublisher postprint66.36 kBRequest copy
Restricted access
08b_mssp.pdfNo commentaryPublisher postprint78.42 kBRequest copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.