How do cumulative live birth rates and cumulative multiple live birth rates over complete courses of assisted reproductive technology treatment per woman compare among registries?
De Neubourg, Diane; Bogaerts, Kris; Blockeel, Christopheet al.
Reproductive medicine (gynecology, andrology, obstetrics)
Author, co-author :
De Neubourg, Diane; University Hospitals Leuven > Leuven University Fertility Centre
Bogaerts, Kris; Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - KUL > I-BioStat
Blockeel, Christophe; Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - UZB > Centre for Reproductive Medicine
Coetsier, Tom; AZ St Lucas > Fertility Centre
Delvigne, Annick; Clinique Saint-Vincent > Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée
Devreker, Fabienne; Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles - Hôpital Erasme > Laboratoire de Procréation Médicalement Assistée
Dubois, Michel; Université de Liège - ULiège > Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée
Gillain, Nicolas ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique : aspects spécifiques
Gordts, Stephan; Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology
Wyns, Christine; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Bruxelles) > Department of Gynaecology-Andrology
Language :
English
Title :
How do cumulative live birth rates and cumulative multiple live birth rates over complete courses of assisted reproductive technology treatment per woman compare among registries?
Adashi EY, Wyden R. Public reporting of clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs: implications for other medical and surgical procedures. JAMA 2011;306:1135-1136.
Arie S. Twin dilemma. BMJ 2014;348:f7603.
Barnhart KT. Live birth is the correct outcome for clinical trials evaluating therapy for the infertile couple. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1205-1208.
Daya S. Life table (survival) analysis to generate cumulative pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction: are we overestimating our success rates? Hum Reprod 2005;20:1135-1143.
De Neubourg D, Bogaerts K, Wyns C, Albert A, Camus M, Candeur M, Degueldre M, Delbaere A, Delvigne A, De Sutter P et al. The history of Belgian assisted reproduction technology cycle registration and control: a case study in reducing the incidence of multiple pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2709-2719.
De Neubourg D, Peeraer K, Debrock S, D'Hooghe T. Belgium model of coupling reimbursement of ART costs to restriction in number of embryos transferred. BMJ 2014;348:g1559.
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Lederman A, Gibbons W, Schattman GL, Lobo RA, Leach RE, Stern JE. Cumulative birth rates with linked assisted reproductive technology cycles. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2483-2491.
Malizia BA, Hacker MR, Penzias AS. Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2009;360:236-243.
Malizia BA, Dodge LE, Penzias AS, Hacker MR. The cumulative probability of liveborn multiples after in vitro fertilization: a cohort study of more than 10,000 women. Fertil Steril 2013;99:393-399.
National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit. https://npesu.unsw.edu.au (14 August 2015, date last accessed).
Olivius K, Friden B, Lundin K, Bergh C. Cumulative probability of live birth after three in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril 2002;77:505-510.
Peeraer K, Debrock S, Laenen A, De Loecker P, Spiessens C, De Neubourg D, D'Hooghe TM. The impact of legally restricted embryo transfer and reimbursement policy on cumulative delivery rate after treatment with assisted reproduction technology. Hum Reprod 2014;29:267-275.
