Unpublished conference/Abstract (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Home Blood Pressure in Kidney Transplant Recipients (ktr)- Validity of different schedules of self-monitoring
Saint-Remy, Annie; WEEKERS, Laurent; BONVOISIN, Catherine et al.
2015Scientific Meeting of the Belgian Hypertension Committee
 

Files


Full Text
abstract CBH VUB HBP days 180915 official sent to Persu.pdf
Author postprint (12.51 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
home blood pressure; kidney transplant recipients; optimal schedule; number of days
Abstract :
[en] HOME BLOOD PRESSURE IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS (KTR)-Validity of different schedules of self-monitoring A. Saint-Remy, L. Weekers, C. Bonvoisin, P. Xhignesse, B.Dubois, JM. Krzesinski NEPHROLOGY - CHU LIEGE AIM: Office blood pressure (OBP), 24-h ambulatory monitoring (ABPM) and home self- monitoring (HBP) allow assessing BP control in treated HT patients. For HBP, ESH guidelines recommend 7 days of measurements but that duration is questioned. The present study analyzed the agreement between daytime ABP and different schedules for HBP in 70 treated hypertensive KTR. METHOD: BP control defined by OBP <140/90 and daytime ABP or HBP <135/85 mmHg was tested in 70 KTR (mean age 56 ± 11 y; mean graft survival 7 ± 6.6 y). OBP and HBP were measured with an Omron M6 and 24-h ABPM with a Spacelabs 90207. HBP was measured on consecutive days (2 times in morning and 2 times at evening/day), the first day was discarded for the mean calculation. Agreement between daytime and HBP was studied when HBP was measured during 7, 5 or 3 days. RESULTS: BP was uncontrolled in 50% of the KTR based on OBP, in 61 % according to daytime ABP and even in 64 % with HBP. Sensitivity (Se) testing agreement between daytime ABP and HBP decreased progressively when number of days was shortened: the highest Se was observed for a 7 days duration with 1st day discarded (86 %). Specificity (Sp) fluctuated around 70 % and was the highest for a 5 (73 %) and 3 days schedule. However the 5 days schedule had higher Se (83 %) than the 3 days. Proportions of KTR correctly classified according to daytime ABP were 79 %, 79 % and 78 % with the 7, 5 or 3 days schedule, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HBP, easier and less restricting method than 24h ABPM, is a good alternative to daytime ABPM as nearly 80 % of treated KTR were similarly classified. HBP recording period can be shortened to 5 days according to Se and Sp. A 3 days schedule seems more risky reducing the chance to identify masked HT due to a decreased drug adherence.
Disciplines :
Urology & nephrology
Author, co-author :
Saint-Remy, Annie ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Néphrologie
WEEKERS, Laurent  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Néphrologie
BONVOISIN, Catherine ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Néphrologie
XHIGNESSE, Patricia ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Néphrologie
DUBOIS, Bernard ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Néphrologie
Krzesinski, Jean-Marie ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Néphrologie
Language :
English
Title :
Home Blood Pressure in Kidney Transplant Recipients (ktr)- Validity of different schedules of self-monitoring
Alternative titles :
[en] Home Blood Pressure in Kidney Transplant Recipients (ktr)- Validity of different schedules of self-monitoring
Publication date :
24 October 2015
Event name :
Scientific Meeting of the Belgian Hypertension Committee
Event organizer :
Belgian Hypertension Committee
Event place :
VUB - Bruxelles, Belgium
Event date :
24 octobre 2015
Available on ORBi :
since 28 October 2015

Statistics


Number of views
92 (33 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
20 (5 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi