2015 • In Kravcik, M; Mikroyannidis, A; Pammer, Vet al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning (ARTEL). In conjunction with the 10th european conference on technology enhanced learning: Design for teaching and learning in a networked world.
annotations; reflection amplifiers; students set the test; split screen learning; amplificateurs de réflexion; reflection prompts; note-taking; widgets; rates of reflection
Abstract :
[en] In a controlled experiment on the effects of frequent and local digital annotations, 137 volunteers covered an online course at 3 conditions: no/free/question-based electronic annotations. Results show no difference in performance between groups. However, analyses conducted within treatments suggest positive impacts on performance when annotation rates are taken into consideration, and coupled with other reflective enactments.
Annotations as reflection amplifiers in online learning - An exploratory study
Alternative titles :
[fr] Des annotations pour amplifier la réflexion - Une étude exploratoire
Publication date :
15 September 2015
Event name :
5th Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning
Event organizer :
University of Toledo
Event place :
Toledo, Spain
Event date :
Sept. 15th
Main work title :
Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning (ARTEL). In conjunction with the 10th european conference on technology enhanced learning: Design for teaching and learning in a networked world.
Main work alternative title :
[fr] Actes du 5ème séminaire sur l'attention et la réflexion en techno-pédagogie
Full reference in APA: Verpoorten D., Specht, M., & Westera, W. (2015). Annotations as reflection amplifiers in online learning – An exploratory study. In M. Kravcik, A. Mikroyannidis, V. Pammer, M. Prilla, & T. Ullmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning, Toledo, Spain, Sept. 15 (Vol. 1475, pp. 11-25). Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (ISSN 1613-0073).
Jackson, H. J.: Marginalia: Readers writing in Books. Yale University Press, New Haven, (2001)
Crawford, C. C.: Some experimental studies of the results of college note-taking. Journal of Educational Research, 12, 379-386 (1925)
Schön, D.: The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple Smith, London (1983)
Commonwealth: Creating learning materials for open and distance learning-A handbook for authors and instructional designers. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2005)
Open University: Guide for the Appointment of Tutorial and Counselling Staff. Open Teaching Toolkits, Open University (1991-1994)
Dillon, A.: Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics 35(10), 1297-1326 (1992). doi: 10.1080/00140139208967394
Priolli, P. (2007): Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information. Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York (2007)
Boch, F., Piolat, A.: Note taking and learning: A summary of research. The WAC Journal 16, 101-113 (2005)
Hartley, J., Davies, I. K.: Note-taking: A critical review. Innovations in Education & Training International 15(3), 207-224 (1978)
Slotte, V., Lonka, K.: Note-taking review-Practical value for learners. Arob@se 1-2, 79-86 (2003)
Makany, T., Kemp, J., Dror, I. E.: Optimising the use of note-taking as an external cognitive aid for increasing learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(4), 619-635 (2009). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00906.x
Degani, A., Wiener, E. L.: Human factor of flight-deck checklists: The normal checklist. NASA, Moffett Field (1990).
Van der Baaren, J., Schuwer, R., Kirschner, P., Hendriks, M.: Finding your way into an open online learning community. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 4 (2008).
Hwang, W.-Y., Chen, N.-S., Shadiev, R., Li, J.-S.: Effects of reviewing annotations and homework solutions on math learning achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology 42(6), 1016-1028 (2011).
Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., Canny, J.: Livenotes: a system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. Paper presented at the CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Portland, Oregon, USA (2005)
Glahn, C.: Contextual support of social engagement and reflection on the Web. PhD series, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, The Netherlands (2009). https://www.ou.nl/Docs/Onderzoek/Promoties/2009/Christian-Glahn-thesis.pdf
Verpoorten, D., Glahn, C., Chatti, A., Westera, W., Specht, M.: Self-Reported Learning Effects of a Tagging Activity Carried out in a Personal Learning Environment (PLE) by Secondary-School Pupils. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education 2(1), 276-284 (2011).
Schilit, B., Golovchinsky, G., Price, M.: Beyond paper: supporting active reading with free form digital ink annotations. Paper presented at the Conference on Human factors in computing systems, Los Angeles, CA, USA (1998). http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/151959
Kawase, R., Papadakis, G., Herder, E., Nejdl, W.: Creation and Use of Annotations in Different Usage Contexts. L3S Research Center Hannover (NA). http://stellarnet.eu/d/1/2/images/a/ae/Sss1.pdf
Hwang, W.-Y., Hsu, G.-L.: The Effects of Pre-Reading and Sharing Mechanisms on Learning with the Use of Annotations. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET 10(2), 234-249 (2011). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ932242.pdf
Glover, I., Xu, Z., Hardaker, G. Online annotation-Research and practices. Computers & Education 49(4), 1308-1320 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.02.006
Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., Specht, M.: Reflection amplifiers in online courses: a classification framework. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 21(4), 654-666 (2010) http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/151374
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D.: Reflection, Turning Experience into Learning. Kogan Page, London (1985)
Butler, D. L., Winne, P. H.: Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65(3), 245-281 (1995)
Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., Specht, M.: Infusing reflective practice in eLearning courses-can widgets help? International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 3(1), 93-109109 (2011). http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/151348
Eshuis, J.H., Goltstein, G.P.: Seks en de evolutie. Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen (2007). http://www.ou.nl/eCache/DEF/2/22/850.html
Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., Specht, M.: A first approach to "Learning Dashboards" in formal learning contexts. Paper presented at the ADVTEL workshop (1st International Workshop on Enhancing Learning with Ambient Displays and Visualization Techniques) at EC-TEL 2011, Palermo, Italy (2011). http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/151988
Bijker, M., Van der Klink, M., Boshuizen, H.: Modeling self-efficacy, self-regulation, selfdirected learning and career processes of adult professionals and relations with learning outcomes and labour market success. Paper presented at the 5th EARLI-SIG14 Learning and Professional Development, Munich, Germany (2010)
Hinett, K.: Improving Learning through Reflection.York: Higher Education Academy, York (2002)
Claxton, G.: Expanding the capacity to learn: a new end for education? Opening keynote address presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Warwick, UK. (2006). http://www.buildinglearningpower.co.uk/includes/pdf-library/GC-BERA-Keynote.pdf
Hwang, W.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Sharples, M.: A Study of Multimedia Annotation of Web-Based Materials. Computers and Education, 48(4), 680-699 (2007)
Nokelainen, P., Miettinen, M., Kurhila, J., Floréen, P., Tirri, H. : A shared document-based annotation tool to support learner-centred collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 36(5), 757-770 (2005)
Slotte, V., Lonka, K.: Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on text comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 1-20 (1999)
Mark, G., Gudith, D., Klocke, U. The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. Paper presented at the 26th annual SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, Florence, Italy (2008). doi: 10.1145/1357054.1357072
Palanque, P., Winckler, M., Martinie, C.: A Formal Model-Based Approach for Designing Interruptions-Tolerant Advanced User Interfaces. Computational Intelligence 340, 143-169 (2011). doi 10.1007/978-3-642-14562-9-8
Verpoorten, D., Glahn, C., Kravcik, M., Ternier, S., Specht, M.: Personalisation of learning in virtual learning environments. Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines. Pro-ceedings 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2009, 52-66 (2009). http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/151458
Crawford, M.: The world beyond your head. How to flourish in an age of distraction. Viking, Great Britain (2015)
Verma, V., Gagliardi, F., Ferretti, C.: On pooling of data and measures. DMQ 84 (2009)
DeCoster, J., Iselin, A.-M. R., Gallucci, M.: A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization. Psychological Methods 14(4), 349-366 (2009). doi: 10.1037/a0016956
Terhart, E.: Constructivism and teaching: a new paradigm in general didactics? Journal of Curriculum Studies 35(1), 25-44 (2003).
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Clark, R. E.: Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist 41(2), 75-86 (2006)
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A.: Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist 42(2), 99-107 (2007). doi: 10.1080/00461520701263368
Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., Clark, R. E.: Why Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries. Educational Psychologist 42(2), 115-121 (2007). doi: 10.1080/00461520701263426
