Unpublished conference/Abstract (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Towards an experiment based protocol for extracting and identifying residues
Cnuts, Dries; Rots, Veerle
2015AWRANA Meeting 2015: Connecting people and technologies
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Abstract Awrana_Dries Cnuts_Final.pdf
Author preprint (262.47 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Residue analysis; Lithics; Prehistory; Extraction; Methodology
Abstract :
[en] Residue analysis has recently become a widely applied method in reconstructing the lifecycle of prehistoric stone tools. The identification of residues is traditionally based on the distinctive morphologies of the residue fragments by means of light microscopy. The majority of residue fragments, however, tend to have an amorphous structure and are therefore not easy to identify. In addition, some residue categories can only be detected by using transmitted light microscopy, which requires the extraction of residues from the tool’s surface. Yet another challenge is to determine whether the residues were deposited on the tool’s surface as a result of use or due to other processes. Here we present the results of an experimental study that addresses these methodological issues. Stone tools from a new experimental reference collection were used to test 6 different analytical methods: the observation of residues on stone tools with incident light microscopy, dry sampling using tweezers and brushes, wet sampling with micropipettes using distilled water and a tri-mixture of acetonitrile, ethanol and water, and extraction with an ultrasonic scaler or bath. The experiments demonstrate that the choice of a particular extraction procedure may influence the amount and types of residues that are extracted. This implies that the analytical method has an impact on the results of a residue analysis. Building on these data, we designed a new protocol, which was subsequently submitted to blind testing in order to test its accuracy and precision. Certain key attributes were also identified that may prove useful in distinguishing between use-related and natural residues. We discuss the importance of adapting analytical protocols to the research question of the study.
Research center :
Traceolab
Disciplines :
Archaeology
Author, co-author :
Cnuts, Dries  ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences historiques > Archéologie préhistorique
Rots, Veerle  ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences historiques > Archéologie préhistorique
Language :
English
Title :
Towards an experiment based protocol for extracting and identifying residues
Publication date :
29 May 2015
Event name :
AWRANA Meeting 2015: Connecting people and technologies
Event organizer :
Association of Archaeological Wear and Residue Analysts (AWRANA)
Event place :
Leiden, Netherlands
Event date :
du 27 Mai au 30 Mai 2015
Audience :
International
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
European Projects :
FP7 - 312283 - EVO-HAFT - Evolution of stone tool hafting in the Palaeolithic
Name of the research project :
FP7 ; 312283 - EVO-HAFT - Evolution of stone tool hafting in the Palaeolithic
Funders :
CER - Conseil Européen de la Recherche [BE]
CE - Commission Européenne [BE]
Available on ORBi :
since 29 June 2015

Statistics


Number of views
90 (9 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
38 (5 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi