Publication outcomes of the abstracts presented at the 2011 European Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculo-Skeletal Diseases (ECCEO-IOF11) : A position paper of the European Society for Clinical and Economical Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculo-Skeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis and Other Skeletal Diseases Foundation (IOF).
[en] The publication outcomes of the abstracts presented during the ECCEO-IOF 2011 reflect a high research productivity, support the robustness of the selection process conducted by the Scientific Advisory Committee and suggest that IOF-ESCEO WCO is successful in its mission to promote and disseminate research. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The European (now World) Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculo-Skeletal Diseases (IOF-ESCEO WCO, formerly ECCEO-IOF) is the largest worldwide event fully dedicated to the clinical, epidemiological, translational and economic aspects of bone, joint and muscle diseases. The role of the Scientific Advisory Committee is to select abstracts for oral communication or poster presentation based on a short summary of the research. The aim of the present survey was to determine the publication rate in international peer reviewed journals of abstracts accepted at the IOF-ESCEO WCO 2011 Meeting (formerly ECCEO-IOF11), the relationship, if any, between the presentation format of the abstract and its subsequent full publication and the impact factor of the journal in which research was published. RESULTS: Of 619 abstracts accepted at the 2011 ECCEO-IOF11 annual meeting, 45 were accepted for oral communication and 574 accepted for poster presentation. In the subsequent 3 years (2011-2014), 191 abstracts were published as a full-length manuscript (30.9 %). The publication rate was significantly higher for oral communications (75.6 %) than for poster presentations (27.4 %; p < 0.0001). Publications derived from oral communications were published in journals with a higher impact factor (8.3 +/- 10.1) than those arising from poster presentations (4.0 +/- 2.3; p < 0.0001), but there was no difference in the time to publication (OC 16.3 [IQR 8.4-23.3] months vs PP 11.3 [IQR 5.3-21.4]; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: These results indicate a high research productivity and an appropriate selection of oral communication by the Scientific Advisory Committee of ESCEO-IOF.
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Rabenda, Véronique ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Bruyère, Olivier ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Cooper, Cyrus
Rizzoli, Rene
Buckinx, Fanny ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Reginster, Jean-Yves ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Language :
English
Title :
Publication outcomes of the abstracts presented at the 2011 European Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculo-Skeletal Diseases (ECCEO-IOF11) : A position paper of the European Society for Clinical and Economical Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculo-Skeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis and Other Skeletal Diseases Foundation (IOF).
Amarilyo G, Woo JM, Furst DE, Hoffman OL, Eval R, Piao C, Parker DS, McCurdy DK (2013) Publication outcomes of abstracts presented at an American College of Rheumatology/Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals annual scientific meeting. Arthritis Care Res 65(4):622–629
Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Cook DJ, Dirschl D, Schemitsch EH, Guyatt GH (2003) Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(1):158–163
No authors listed (2011) Abstracts of the First IOF-ESCEO Pre-Clinical Symposium and the ECCEO11-IOF Congress. Valencia, Spain. Osteoporosis Int 22(Suppl. 1):1–416
Secil M, Ucar G, Dicle O (2007) Scientific papers presented at the 2000–2001 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) meetings: publication rates during the period 2000–2004. Eur Radiol 17(8):2183–2186
Gilbert WM, Pitkin RM (2004) Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting presentations: what gets published and why? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(1):32–35
Schnatz PF, Romegialli A, Abrantes J, Marakovits K, Cunningham D, O’Sullivan DM (2008) The North American Menopause Society: from abstract to publication. Menopause 15(5):996–1001
Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, De Sio M, Damiano R (2007) Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-review journals? A critical analysis. Eur Urol 51(3):833–840
Hoag CC, Elterman DS, Macneily AE (2006) Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication. J Urol 176(6):2624–2629
Carroll AE, Sox CM, Tarini BA, Ringold S, Christakis DA (2003) Does presentation format at the Pediatric Academic Societies’ annual meeting predict subsequent publication? Pediatrics 112(6):1238–1241
Papagikos MA, Rossi PJ, Lee WR (2005) Publication rate of abstracts from the annual ASTRO meeting: comparison with other organizations. J Am Coll Radiol 2(1):72–75
Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E (2007) Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(2), MR000005
Donegan DJ, Kim TW, Lee GC (2010) Publication rates of presentations at an annual meeting of the American academy of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(5):1428–1435
Song J, Li M, Hwang DH, Ricciotti RW, Chang A (2010) The outcome of abstracts presented at the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology annual meetings. Mod Pathol 23(5):682–685
Song F, Loke Y, Hooper L (2014) Why are medical and health-related studies not being published? A systematic review of reasons given by investigators. PLoS One 15(9), e110418