Article (Scientific journals)
The Brussels Court judgement in Commission v Elevators manufacturers, or the story of how the Commission lost an action for damages based on its own infringement decision.
Marcos Ramos, Jorge; Muheme, Daniel
2015In European Competition Law Review, 36 (9)
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Marcos Ramos and Muheme, 2015, Commission v Elevators-How the Commission Lost an Action for Damages.pdf
Publisher postprint (213.91 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Competition Law; Damages Directive; Elevators
Abstract :
[en] With the proceedings before the Brussels Court, the Commission emphasized its growing need to promote claims for damages for infringements of EU Competition law. Ahead of the implementation of the Damages Directive, and with its own infringement decision in hand, this claim seemed to be an easy exercise for the Commission to recoup the allegedly surplus paid for the maintenance contracts.
Research center :
LCII - Liège Competition and Innovation Institute - ULiège
Precision for document type :
Analysis of case law/Statutory reports
Disciplines :
European & international law
Author, co-author :
Marcos Ramos, Jorge ;  Université de Liège > HEC-Ecole de gestion : UER > Economie industrielle
Muheme, Daniel ;  Université de Liège > Département de droit > Droit européen de la concurrence
Language :
English
Title :
The Brussels Court judgement in Commission v Elevators manufacturers, or the story of how the Commission lost an action for damages based on its own infringement decision.
Publication date :
August 2015
Journal title :
European Competition Law Review
ISSN :
0144-3054
Publisher :
Sweet & Maxwell
Volume :
36
Issue :
9
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Funders :
ARC
Available on ORBi :
since 20 April 2015

Statistics


Number of views
1633 (31 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
210 (8 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi