Paper published in a journal (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Drawing-up of pesticide selectivity lists to beneficial arthropods for IPM programmes in potato.
Hautier, L.; Jansen, J. P.; Schiffers, Bruno et al.
2004In Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 69 (3), p. 171-81
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Hautier.Gent.2004.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.07 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Insecticide; Herbicide; Fungicides; beneficial arthropods; biological pest control
Abstract :
[en] In order to promote IPM programmes in potato, the toxicity of 19 fungicides, 4 herbicides and 11 insecticides commonly used in this crop in Belgium was assessed on three beneficial arthropods. These species were representative of the most important aphid specific natural enemies encountered in potatoes: a parasitic wasp--Aphidius rhopalosiphi (De Stefani-Perez) (Hym., Aphidiidae), a ladybird--Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Col., Coccinellidae) and a hoverfly--Episyrphus balteatus (Dipt., Syrphidae). In a first time, pesticides were tested on glass plates on A. rhopalosiphi adults and A. bipunctata and E. balteatus larvae. For each insect, products inducing corrected mortality (Mc) lower than 30% were directly classified in a positive list for harmless products (green list). The other compounds were further tested on plants and listed in toxicity classes according to mortalities induced during this extended laboratory test: harmless (Mc < 30%), slightly harmful (30% < Mc < 60%), moderately harmful (60% < Mc < 80%) and harmful (Mc > 80). A chemical determination of pesticides residues was also performed for each experiment in order to determine the exposure of beneficial arthropods to pesticide residues and to validate the application of chemicals on tested substrates. On the basis of the results of acute toxicity tests, the period of each pesticide use according to normal agricultural practices and the abundance and importance of the three different groups of aphid natural enemies at different periods of the year, four pesticides lists were built up. Each list corresponded to a different period of pesticides application: Period I--from seedling to beginning of June (based on A. rhopalosiphi tests), Period II--beginning to end of June (based on A. rhopalosiphi tests), Period III beginning to end of July (based on E. balteatus and A. bipunctata tests) and Period IV--August to harvest (no exposure of beneficials). Results showed that herbicides were not toxic to the three species and can be used according to normal agricultural practices without restrictions. All fungicides can also be used without restrictions at recommended rates. Only the mixture Metalaxyl-M + Fluazinam was slightly harmful to A. bipunctata but had no effects on A. rhopalosiphi and E. balteatus. Results were more contrasted for insecticides and none of them was totally selective for all the 3 beneficial arthropods. Therefore, they can only be used with restrictions at periods II and III, according to the beneficial species that need to be protected.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Entomology & pest control
Author, co-author :
Hautier, L.
Jansen, J. P.
Schiffers, Bruno ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech
Deleu, R.
Moreira, C.
Language :
English
Title :
Drawing-up of pesticide selectivity lists to beneficial arthropods for IPM programmes in potato.
Publication date :
2004
Event name :
56th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CROP PROTECTION
Event organizer :
UGent
Event place :
Gent, Belgium
Event date :
4 mai 2004
By request :
Yes
Audience :
International
Journal title :
Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences
ISSN :
1379-1176
Publisher :
Universiteit Gent (UGent), Gent, Belgium
Volume :
69
Issue :
3
Pages :
171-81
171-182
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 03 February 2015

Statistics


Number of views
113 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
126 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
1
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi