[en] Purpose
This study assessed the efficacy of a 38-hour communication skills training program designed to
train a multidisciplinary radiotherapy team.
Methods
Four radiotherapy teams were randomly assigned to a training program or a waiting list.
Assessments were scheduled at baseline and after training for the training group and at baseline
and 4 months later for the waiting list group. Assessments included an audio recording of a
radiotherapy planning session to assess team members’ communication skills and expression of
concerns of patients with breast cancer (analyzed with content analysis software) and an adapted
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer satisfaction with care questionnaire
completed by patients at the end of radiotherapy.
Results
Two hundred thirty-seven radiotherapy planning sessions were recorded. Compared with members
of the untrained teams, members of the trained teams acquired, over time, more assessment
skills (P = .003) and more supportive skills (P = .050) and provided more setting information (P =
.010). Over time, patients interacting with members of the trained teams asked more open
questions (P = .022), expressed more emotional words (P = .025), and exhibited a higher
satisfaction level regarding nurses’ interventions (P = .028).
Conclusion
The 38-hour training program facilitated transfer of team member learned communication skills to
the clinical practice and improved patients’ satisfaction with care.
Disciplines :
Business & economic sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Merckaert, Isabelle
Delevallez, France
Gibon, Anne-Sophie
Liénard, Aurore
Libert, Yves
Delvaux, Nicole
Marchal, Serge
Etienne, Anne-Marie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Départ. de Psychologies et Cliniques des Systèmes humains > Psychologie de la santé
Bragard, Isabelle ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Départ. de Psychologies et Cliniques des Systèmes humains > Psychologie de la santé
Reynaert, Christine
Slachmuylder, Jean-Louis
Scalliet, Pierre
Van Houtte, Paul
Coucke, Philippe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Radiothérapie
Slotman BJ, Leer JW: Infrastructure of radiotherapy in the Netherlands: Evaluation of prognoses and introduction of a new model for determining the needs. Radiother Oncol 66:345-349, 2003
Nijman JL, Sixma H, van Triest B, et al: The quality of radiation care: The results of focus group interviews and concept mapping to explore the patient's perspective. Radiother Oncol 102:154-160, 2012
Eriksen JG, Beavis AW, Coffey MA, et al: The updated ESTRO core curricula 2011 for clinicians, medical physicists and RTTs in radiotherapy/radiation oncology. Radiother Oncol 103:103-108, 2012
Brown AM, Atyeo J, Field N, et al: Evaluation of patient preferences towards treatment during extended hours for patients receiving radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer: A time trade-off study. Radiother Oncol 90:247-252, 2009
Adler J, Paelecke-Habermann Y, Jahn P, et al: Patient information in radiation oncology: A crosssectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module. Radiat Oncol 4:40, 2009
Stiegelis HE, Ranchor AV, Sanderman R: Psychological functioning in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Patient Educ Couns 52:131-141, 2004
Halkett GK, Kristjanson LJ: Patients' perspectives on the role of radiation therapists. Patient Educ Couns 69:76-83, 2007
Halkett GK, Kristjanson LJ, Lobb E, et al: Meeting breast cancer patients' information needs during radiotherapy: What can we do to improve the information and support that is currently provided? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 19:538-547, 2010
Halkett GK, Kristjanson LJ, Lobb E, et al: Information needs and preferences of women as they proceed through radiotherapy for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 86:396-404, 2011
Douma KF, Koning CC, de Haes HC, et al: Do radiation oncologists tailor information to patients needs? And, if so, does it affect patients? Acta Oncol 51:512-520, 2012
Gibon AS, Merckaert I, Liénard A, et al: Is it possible to improve radiotherapy team members' communication skills? A randomized study assessing the efficacy of a 38-hour communication skills training program. Radiother Oncol 109:170-177, 2013
Kissane DW, Bylund CL, Banerjee SC, et al: Communication skills training for oncology professionals. J Clin Oncol 30:1242-1247, 2012
van den Eertwegh V, van Dulmen S, van Dalen J, et al: Learning in context: Identifying gaps in research on the transfer of medical communication skills to the clinical workplace. Patient Educ Couns 90:184-192, 2013
Razavi D, Merckaert I, Marchal S, et al: How to optimize physicians' communication skills in cancer care: Results of a randomized study assessing the usefulness of posttraining consolidation workshops. J Clin Oncol 21:3141-3149, 2003
Heaven C, Clegg J, Maguire P: Transfer of communication skills training from workshop to workplace: The impact of clinical supervision. Patient Educ Couns 60:313-325, 2006
Lienard A, Merckaert I, Libert Y, et al: Transfer of communication skills to the workplace during clinical rounds: Impact of a program for residents. PloS One 5:e12426, 2010
Timmermans LM, van der Maazen RW, van Spaendonck KP, et al: Enhancing patient participation by training radiation oncologists. Patient Educ Couns 63:55-63, 2006
Williams C, Cantillon P, Cochrane M: The doctor-patient relationship: From undergraduate assumptions to pre-registration reality. Med Educ 35: 743-747, 2001
Stiefel F, Barth J, Bensing J, et al: Communication skills training in oncology: A position paper based on a consensus meeting among European experts in 2009. Ann Oncol 21:204-207, 2010
Merckaert I, Libert Y, Razavi D: Communication skills training in cancer care: Where are we and where are we going? Curr Opin Oncol 17:319-330, 2005
Liénard A, Merckaert I, Libert Y, et al: Is it possible to improve residents breaking bad news skills? A randomised study assessing the efficacy of a communication skills training program. Br J Cancer 103:171-177, 2010
Gibon A-S, Durieux J-F, Merckaert I, et al: Development of the Lacomm, a French medical communication analysis software: A study assessing its sensitivity to change. Psychooncology 19: 133-134, 2010
Booth K, Maguire P: Development of a Rating System to Assess Interaction Between Cancer Patients and Health Professionals. London, United Kingdom, Report to Cancer Research Campaign, 1991
Poinsot R, Altmeyer A, Conroy T, et al: Multi-site validation study of questionnaire assessing outpatient satisfaction with care questionnaire in ambulatory chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment. Bull Cancer 93:315-327, 2006
Larson MG: Analysis of variance. Circulation 117:115-121, 2008
Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, et al: Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16:139-144, 1998
Nguyen TV, Anota A, Bredart A, et al: A longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction with care and quality of life in ambulatory oncology based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire. BMC Cancer 14: 42, 2014
Uitterhoeve RJ, Bensing JM, Grol RP, et al: The effect of communication skills training on patient outcomes in cancer care: A systematic review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 19:442-457, 2010