[en] The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligence (EI). However, there is scarcity of tests measuring EI as a form of intelligence. The Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, or MSCEIT, is among the few available and the most widespread measure of EI as an ability. This implies that conclusions about the value of EI as a meaningful construct and about its utility in predicting various outcomes mainly rely on the properties of this test. We tested whether individuals who have the highest probability of choosing the most correct response on any item of the test are also those who have the strongest EI ability. Results showed that this is not the case for most items: The answer indicated by experts as the most correct in several cases was not associated with the highest ability; furthermore, items appeared too easy to challenge individuals high in EI. Overall results suggest that the MSCEIT is best suited to discriminate persons at the low end of the trait. Results are discussed in light of applied and theoretical considerations.
Disciplines :
Social, industrial & organizational psychology
Author, co-author :
Fiori, Marina
Antonietti, Jean-Philippe
Mikolajczak, Moira
Luminet, Olivier
Hansenne, Michel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie : cognition et comportement > Psycho. de la personnalité et des différences individuelles
Rossier, Jerome
Language :
English
Title :
What is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) good for? An evaluation using item response theory.
Publication date :
2014
Journal title :
PLoS ONE
eISSN :
1932-6203
Publisher :
Public Library of Science, United States - California
Roberts RD, MacCann C, Matthews G, Zeidner M (2010) Emotional intelligence: Towards a consensus of models, measures, and applications. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 10: 821-840.
Antonakis J, Dietz J (2010) Emotional intelligence: On definitions, neuroscience, and marshmallows. Ind Organ Psychol 3: 165-170.
Fiori M, Antonakis J (2011) The ability model of emotional intelligence: Searching for valid measures. Pers Indiv Differ 50: 329-334.
Schulte MJ, Ree MJ, Carretta TR (2004) Emotional intelligence: Not much more than g and personality. Pers Indiv Differ 37: 1059-1068. (Pubitemid 39150656)
Farrelly D, Austin EJ (2007) Ability EI as an intelligence? Associations of the MSCEIT with performance on emotion-processing and social tasks and with cognitive ability. Cognition Emotion 21: 1043-1063. (Pubitemid 47180566)
Fiori M, Antonakis J (2012) Selective attention to emotional stimuli: What IQ and openness do, and emotional intelligence does not. Intelligence 40: 245-254.
Roberts RD, Schulze R, O'Brien K, MacCann C, Reid J, et al. (2006) Exploring the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) with established emotions measures. Emotion 6: 663-669. (Pubitemid 44912376)
Mayer JD, Caruso D, Salovey P (1999) Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence 27: 267-298.
MacCann C, Roberts RD, Matthews G, Zeidner M (2003) Psychological assessment of emotional intelligence: A review of self-report and performancebased testing. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 11: 247-274. (Pubitemid 38104930)
Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso DL, Sitarenios G (2001) Emotional intelligence as a standard intelligence. Emotion 1: 232-242.
Mayer JD, Salovey P (1997) What is emotional intelligence? In Salovey P, Sluyter D, editors. Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators. New York: Basic Books. pp3-31.
Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso DR (2008) Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits. Am Psychol 63: 503-517.
Mayer JD, Caruso D, Salovey P (2000) Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267-298.
Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso DR, Sitarenios G (2003) Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. Emotion 2: 97-105. (Pubitemid 37322448)
Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso DR (2012) The validity of the MSCEIT: Additional analyses and evidence. Emotion Review 4: 403-408.
Matthews G, Roberts RD, Zeidner M (2004) Seven myths about emotional intelligence. Psychol Inq 15: 179-196. (Pubitemid 39443242)
Maul A (2012) The validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT) as a measure of emotional intelligence. Emotion Review 4: 394-402.
Petrides KV (2011) Ability and Trait emotional ntelligence. In Chamorro- Premuzic T, von Stumm S, Furnham A, editors. The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. 656-678.
Cooper A, Petrides KV (2010) A psychometric analysis of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF) using Item Response Theory. J Pers Assess 92: 449-457.
Petrides KV (2009) Technical manual for the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaires (TEIQue) (1st edition, 4th printing). Psychometric Laboratory. London: London.
Maul A (2011) Examining the structure of emotional intelligence at the item level: New perspectives, new conclusions. Cognition Emotion 26: 503-520.
Bock RD, Mislevy RJ (1982) Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Appl Psych Meas 6: 431-444.
Wu ML, Adams RJ, Wilson MR (1997) ConQuest: Multi-Aspect Test Software, [computer program] Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Wu ML (1997) The Development and Application of a Fit Test for Use with Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Generalised Item Response Models. Unpublished masters dissertation. University of Melbourne.
Rizopoulos D (2006) ltm: An R package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses. J Stat Softw 17: 1-25.
Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso DR (2004) Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psych Inq 15: 197-215. (Pubitemid 39443243)
Zinbarg R, Yovel I, Revelle W, McDonald R (2006) Estimating generalizability to a universe of indicators that all have one attribute in common: A comparison of estimators for omega. Appl Psych Meas 30: 121-144. (Pubitemid 43260906)
Roberts RD, Zeidner M, Mathews G (2001) Does emotional intelligence meet traditional standards for an intelligence? Some new data and conclusions. Emotion 1: 196-231.
Larsen JT, Norris CJ, McGraw AP, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT (2009) The evaluative space grid: A single-item measure of positivity and negativity. Cognition Emotion 23: 453-480.