Reference : The rationale to switch from postoperative accelerated radiotherapy to preoperative hype...
Scientific journals : Article
Human health sciences : Oncology
Human health sciences : Hematology
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/17007
The rationale to switch from postoperative accelerated radiotherapy to preoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in rectal cancer.
English
COUCKE, Philippe mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Radiothérapie >]
Sartirelli, Britta [ > > ]
Cuttat, Jean-François [ > > ]
Jeanneret, Wendy [ > > ]
Gillet, Michel [ > > ]
Mirimanoff, René-Olivier [ > > ]
1995
International Journal of Radiation, Oncology, Biology, Physics
Elsevier Science
32
1
181-188
International
0360-3016
Tarrytown
NY
[en] Hyperfractionation ; Acceleration ; Preoperative radiotherapy ; Rectal cancer
[en] Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of preoperative Hyperfractionated Accelerated RadioTherapy
(preop-HART) in rectal cancer and to explain the rationales to switch from postoperative HART to preoperative
HART.
Methods and
1989. In trial
Materials: Fifty-two consecutive patients were introduced in successive Phase I trials since
89-01. m&operative HART (48 Gv in 3 weeks) was applied in 20 patients. In nine patients
with locally advanced rectal cancer, considered unresectable by the surgeon, 32 Gy in 2 weeks was-applied
prior to surgery (trial 89-02). Since 1991, 41.6 Gy in 2.5 weeks has been applied preoperatively to 23
patients with T3-T4 any N rectal cancer immediately followed by surgery (trial 91-01). All patients were
irradiated at the department of radiation-oncology with a four-field box technique (1.6 Gy twice a day and
with at least a 6-h interval between fractions). The minimal accelerating potential was 6 MV. Acute toxicity
was scored according to the World Health Organization (WHO for skin and small bowel) and the Radiation
Therapy Oncology Group criteria (RTOG for bladder). This was done weekly during treatment and every
3 months thereafter. Small bowel volume was estimated by a modiiied “Gallagher’s” method.
Results: Acute toxicity was acceptable both in postoperative and preoperative setup. The mean acute toxicity
~significantly lower in trial 91-01 compared to 89-01. This difference was due to the smaller amount of
small bowel in irradiation field and lower total dose in trial 91-01. Moreover, there was a significantly
reduced delay between surgery and radiotherapy favoring trial 91-01 (median delay 4 days compared to
46 days in trial 89-01). Nearly all patients in trial 89-02 and 91-01 underwent surgery (31 out of 32; 97%).
Resection margins were negative in 29 out of 32. Hospitalization duration in trial 91-01 was not significantly
different from trial 89-01 (19 vs. 21 days, respectively).
Conclusions: Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy immediately followed by surgery is feasible as
far as acute toxicity is concerned. Preoperative HART is favored by a significantly lower acute toxicity
related, in part, to a smaller amount of irradiated small bowel, and a shorter duration of the delay
between radiotherapy and surgery. Moreover, the hospital stay after preoperative HART is not significantly
increased.
Researchers ; Professionals
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/17007

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
the rationale to switch from prostoperative vol 32(1) sdarticle.pdfNo commentaryAuthor postprint904.39 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.