Article (Scientific journals)
Final Overall Survival: Fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the Randomized CONFIRM Trial.
Leo, Angelo Di; Jerusalem, Guy; Petruzelka, Lubos et al.
2014In Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 106 (1), p. 337
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Final overall survival - Fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the randomized CONFIRM trial.pdf
Author postprint (388.13 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: At the time of the initial analysis of overall survival (OS) for the Comparison of Faslodex in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (CONFIRM) randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, approximately 50% of patients had died. A final analysis of OS was subsequently planned for when 75% of patients had died. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to fulvestrant 500 mg administered as two 5-mL intramuscular injections on days 0, 14, and 28 and every 28 (+/-3) days thereafter or fulvestrant 250 mg administered as two 5-mL intramuscular injections (one fulvestrant and one placebo [identical in appearance to study drug]) on days 0, 14 (two placebo injections only), and 28 and every 28 (+/-3) days thereafter. OS was analyzed using an unadjusted log-rank test. No adjustments were made for multiplicity. Serious adverse events (SAEs) and best response to subsequent therapy were also reported. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: In total, 736 women (median age = 61.0 years) were randomly assigned to fulvestrant 500mg (n = 362) or 250mg (n = 374). At the final survival analysis, 554 of 736 (75.3%) patients had died. Median OS was 26.4 months for fulvestrant 500mg and 22.3 months for 250mg (hazard ratio = 0.81; 95% confidence interval = 0.69-0.96; nominal P = .02). There were no clinically important differences in SAE profiles between the treatment groups; no clustering of SAEs could be detected in either treatment group. Type of first subsequent therapy and objective responses to first subsequent therapy were well balanced between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, fulvestrant 500mg is associated with a 19% reduction in risk of death and a 4.1-month difference in median OS compared with fulvestrant 250mg. Fulvestrant 500mg was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Leo, Angelo Di
Jerusalem, Guy  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Oncologie
Petruzelka, Lubos
Torres, Roberto
Bondarenko, Igor N.
Khasanov, Rustem
Verhoeven, Didier
Pedrini, Jose L.
Smirnova, Iya
Lichinitser, Mikhail R.
Pendergrass, Kelly
Malorni, Luca
Garnett, Sally
Rukazenkov, Yuri
Martin, Miguel
More authors (5 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Final Overall Survival: Fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the Randomized CONFIRM Trial.
Publication date :
2014
Journal title :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
ISSN :
0027-8874
eISSN :
1460-2105
Publisher :
Oxford University Press, United Kingdom
Volume :
106
Issue :
1
Pages :
djt337
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 28 January 2014

Statistics


Number of views
133 (5 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
406 (2 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
235
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
225
OpenCitations
 
169

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi