Article (Scientific journals)
THE CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF OFF-LABEL PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY IN ONCO-DERMATOLOGY
WAUTERS, Odile; CAUCANAS, Marie; RICHERT, Bertrand et al.
2010In American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
the clinical relevance of oof label.pdf
Publisher postprint (4.9 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Photodynamic therapy; intraepithelial neoplasia; cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; cutaneous metastases; extramammary Paget disease; verrucous carcinoma
Abstract :
[en] Background : Besides actinic keratosis, Bowen's disease, as well as superficial and small nodular basal cell carcinoma, aminolevulinic acid and methylaminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT, MAL-PDT) present a broad potential of experimental indications in oncologic skin conditions. AIM : To present the various off-label indications with their respective PDT protocols, treatment results, level of evidence (A, B, C, D levels), and potential clinical interest. MATERIAL AND METHODS : A Pubmed search matched PDT with actinic cheilitis, anal, vulvar, and penile intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN, VIN, PIN), verrucous carcinoma, Paget disease, extramammary Paget disease, cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (CBCL), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and cutaneous metastases of breast carcinoma. RESULTS : All indications presented interesting complete and partial cures, even in cases faling on previous standard treatments. All publications score C and D levels of evidence. The best PDT outcomes and the lowest recurrence rates concerned unifocal oncologic skin conditions with limited extension. Direct comparison of treatment data was difficult, as PDT protocols were highly variable. Comparative therapeutic trials vs standard care were rarely available. CONCLUSION : PDT represents a valuable treatment alternative in selected off-label oncologic skin conditions. However, literature data are too limited to support a hierarchic treatment position for PDT or a preferential protocol in these specific indications. There is a clear need for clinical trials evaluationg PDT vs standard treatments. In contrast to the approved PDT indications, where clinical evaluation accurately matches histologica evaluation, histology is required in these off- label indications to ensure treatment efficacy. Off-label use of PDT should be measured against the advantages and inconveniencies of standar treatment procedures.
Disciplines :
Dermatology
Author, co-author :
WAUTERS, Odile ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Dermatologie
CAUCANAS, Marie
RICHERT, Bertrand
DEZFOULIAN, Bita ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Dermatologie
NIKKELS, Arjen ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Dermatologie
Language :
English
Title :
THE CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF OFF-LABEL PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY IN ONCO-DERMATOLOGY
Publication date :
25 March 2010
Journal title :
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
ISSN :
1175-0561
eISSN :
1179-1888
Publisher :
Adis International, Auckland, New Zealand
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 20 January 2014

Statistics


Number of views
73 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
4 (4 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi