[en] We investigate the time-dependent variance of the fidelity with which an initial narrow wave packet is reconstructed after its dynamics is time reversed with a perturbed Hamiltonian. In the semiclassical regime of perturbation, we show that the variance first rises algebraically up to a critical time t(c), after which it decays. To leading order in the effective Planck's constant h(eff), this decay is given by the sum of a classical term similar or equal to exp[-2 lambda t], a quantum term similar or equal to 2h(eff) exp[-Gamma t], and a mixed term similar or equal to 2 exp[-(Gamma+lambda)t]. Compared to the behavior of the average fidelity, this allows for the extraction of the classical Lyapunov exponent lambda in a larger parameter range. Our results are confirmed by numerical simulations.
Disciplines :
Physics
Author, co-author :
Petitjean, Cyril ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de physique > Physique quantique statistique
Jacquod, P.
Language :
English
Title :
Mesoscopic fluctuations of the Loschmidt echo
Publication date :
2005
Journal title :
Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
ISSN :
1539-3755
eISSN :
1550-2376
Publisher :
American Physical Soc, College Pk, United States - Maryland
F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos (Springer, Berlin, 2000).
R. Schack and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 525 (1993).
A. Peres, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1610 (1984).
R. A. Jalabert and H. M. Pastawski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2490 (2001).
Ph. Jacquod, P. G. Silvestrov, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. E 64, 055203(R) (2001).
T. Prosen, T. H. Seligman, and M. Znidaric, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 150, 200 (2003).
N. R. Cerruti and S. Tomsovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 054103 (2002).
F. M. Cucchietti, C. H. Lewenkopf, E. R. Mucciolo, H. M. Pastawski, and R. O. Vallejos, Phys. Rev. E 65, 046209 (2002).
D. A. Wisniacki and D. Cohen, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046209 (2002).
Ph. Jacquod and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3501 (1995).
J. Vanicek and E. J. Heller, Phys. Rev. E 68, 056208 (2003).
Y. Adamov, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Phys. Rev. E 67, 056217 (2003).
Ph. Jacquod, I¡. Adagideli, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Europhys. Lett. 61, 729 (2003).
J. Emerson, Y. S. Weinstein, S. Lloyd, and D. G. Cory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 284102 (2002).
Ph. Jacquod, I¡. Adagideli, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 154103 (2002).
A. Iomin, Phys. Rev. E 70, 026206 (2004).
W. Wang, G. Casati, and B. Li, Phys. Rev. E 69, 025201 (R) (2004).
P. G. Silvestrov, J. Tworzydio, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. E 67, 025204(R) (2003).
T. Gorin, T. Prosen, and T. H. Seligman, New J. Phys. 6, 20 (2004).
This time t* is defined by |∈∫ 0 t*V(q s(t),t|=1 for a typical trajectory s.
P. Cvitanović, R. Artuso, R. Mainieri, G. Tanner, and G. Vattay, Chaos: Classical and Quantum (Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen 2003), www.ChaosBook.org
See e.g., E. J. Heller and S. Tomsovic, Phys. Today 46(7), 38 (1993).
Setting s=s′ for two trajectories generated by two different Hamiltonians H=H 0+∈V is justified by the structural stability of hyperbolic systems for not too large ∈; see e.g., A. B. Katok and B. Hasselblatt, Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996). In the context of the fidelity, this point was first mentioned in Ref. [11].
P. Collet and J.-P. Eckmann, J. Stat. Phys. 115, 217 (2004).
G. P. Berman and G. M. Zaslavsky, Physica A 91, 450 (1978); M. V. Berry and N. L. Balasz, J. Phys. A 12, 625 (1979).
G. P. Berman and G. M. Zaslavsky, Physica A 91, 450 (1978); M. V. Berry and N. L. Balasz, J. Phys. A 12, 625 (1979).
M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices (Academic, New York, 1991).
This time is very short, of the order of the inverse energy of the particle, i.e., O(ℏ eff a), where a≥0 depends on the system dimension and the energy-momentum relation. For E∝p 2 and in two dimensions, one has a= 1.
