[en] The authors propose that correction of dispositional inferences involves the examination of situational constraints and the suppression of dispositional inferences. They hypothesized that suppression would result in dispositional rebound. In Study 1, participants saw a video of either a free or a forced speaker. Participants shown a forced speaker later made stronger dispositional inferences about a 2nd, free speaker than control participants did. Study 2 provided evidence for higher rebound among participants who reported trying harder to suppress dispositional inferences during the Ist video. In Study 3, participants were asked to focus on situational constraints or to avoid thinking about the speaker's characteristics. Only the latter instructions led to a dispositional rebound. These data support the view that the correction of dispositional inferences involves 2 processes that lead to distinct consequences in subsequent attribution work.
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Stereotype activation and inhibition: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 11, pp. 1-52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cioffi, D., & Holloway, J. (1993). Delayed costs of suppressed pain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 274-282.
Clark, D. M., Ball, S., & Pape, D. (1991). An experimental investigation of thought suppression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 253-257.
Clark, D. M., Winton, E., & Thynn, L. (1993). A further experimental investigation of thought suppression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 207-210.
Corneille, O., Leyens, J. -P., Yzerbyt, V., & Walther, E. (1999). Judgeability concerns: The interplay of information, applicability, and accountability in the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 377-387.
Davies, M. I., & Clark, D. M. (1998). Thought suppression produces a rebound effect with analogue post-traumatic intrusions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 571-582.
Forster, J., & Liberman, N. (2000). The role of attribution of motivation in producing post-suppressional rebound. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Wuerzburg.
Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention, and control (pp. 189-211). New York: Guilford Press.
Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology, 4th ed. (Vol. 2, pp. 89-150). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
Gilbert, D. T., & Osborne, R. E. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 940-949.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: Wiley.
Jones, E. E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34, 104-117.
Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.
Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 13-37). New York: Guilford Press.
Krull, D. S. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver's inferential goal on the process of social inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 340-348.
Krull, D. S., & Erickson, D. T. (1995). Judging situations: On the effortful process of taking dispositional information into account. Social Cognition, 13, 417-438.
Leyens, J. -P., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Corneille, O. (1996). The role of applicability in the emergence of the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 219-229.
Leyens, J. -P., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Schadron, G. (1994). Stereotypes and social cognition. London: Sage.
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817.
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Wheeler, V. (1996). On resisting the temptation for simplification: Counterintentional effects of stereotype suppression on social memory. Social Cognition, 14, 1-20.
Miller, A.G., & Rorer, L.G. (1982). Toward an understanding of the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Research in Psychology, 16, 41-59.
Miller, A. G., Schmidt, D., Meyer, C., & Colella, A. (1984). The perceived value of constrained behavior: Pressures toward biased inference in the attitude attribution paradigm. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 160-171.
Monteith, M. J., Sherman, J. W., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Suppression as a stereotype strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 63-82.
Newman, L. S., Duff, K. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). A new look at defensive projection: Thought suppression, accessibility, and biased person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 980-1001.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
Quattrone, G. A. (1982). Overattribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 593-607.
Reeder, G. D. (1993).Trait-behavior relations and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 586-593.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Salkovskis, P. M., & Reynolds, M. (1994). Thought suppression and smoking cessation. Behavior Research and Therapy, 32, 193-201.
Sherman, J. W., Stroessner, S. J., Loftus, S. T., & Deguzman, G. (1997). Stereotype suppression and recognition memory for stereotypical and non-stereotypical information. Social Cognition, 15, 205-215.
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227-236.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, A. (1996). Social hypothesis testing: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 239-270). New York: Guilford Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1123-1131.
Webster, D. M. (1993). Motivated augmentation and reduction of the Overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 261-271.
Wegner, D. M. (1992). You can't always think what you want: Problems in the suppression of unwanted thoughts. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 193-225.
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34-52.
Wegner, D. M., & Erber, R. (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 903-912.
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Zanakos, S. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1093-1104.
Wegner, D. M., & Gold, D. B. (1995). Fanning old flames: Emotional and cognitive effects of suppressing thoughts of a past relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 782-792.
Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S., & White, L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5-13.
Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Knutson, B., & McMahon, S. (1991). Polluting the stream of consciousness: The influence of thought suppression on the mind's environment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15, 141-152.
Wegner, D. M., & Wenzlaff, R. M. (1996). Mental control. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 466-492). New York: Guilford Press.
Wenzlaff, R. M., Wegner, D. M., & Klein, S. B. (1991). The role of thought suppression in the bonding of thought and mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 500-508.
Wright, E. F., & Wells, G. L. (1988). Is the attitude-attribution paradigm suitable for investigating the dispositional bias? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 183-190.
Wyer, N. A., Sherman, J. W., & Stroessner, S. J. (1998). The spontaneous suppression of racial stereotypes. Social Cognition, 16, 340-352.
Wyer, N. A., Sherman, J. W., & Stroessner, S. J. (2000). The roles of motivation and ability in controlling the consequences of stereotype suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817.
Yost, J. H., & Weary, G. (1996). Depression and the correspondent inference bias: Evidence for more effortful cognitive processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 192-200.
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Dardenne, B., & Leyens, J. -P. (1998). Social judgeability concerns in impression formation. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, & B. Dardenne (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 126-156). London: Sage.
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Leyens, J. -P., & Corneille, O. (1998). Social judgeability and the bogus pipeline: The role of naive theories on judgment in impression formation. Social Cognition, 16, 56-77.
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Lories, G., & Dardenne, B. (1998). Metacognition: Social and cognitive dimensions. London: Sage.
Yzerbyt, V., Schadron, G., Leyens, J. -P., & Rocher, S. (1994). Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational rules on the use of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 48-55.
