|Reference : The resemblance of one-year-old infants to their fathers : refuting Christenfeld & Hill ...|
|Scientific congresses and symposiums : Paper published in a book|
|Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Theoretical & cognitive psychology|
|The resemblance of one-year-old infants to their fathers : refuting Christenfeld & Hill (1995)|
|French, R. [> > > >]|
|Brédart, Serge [Université de Liège - ULg > Département des sciences cognitives > Psychologie cognitive >]|
|Huart, Johanne [Université de Liège - ULg > Département des sciences cognitives > Département des sciences cognitives >]|
|Labiouse, C. [> > > >]|
|Proceedings of the 22nd Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society|
|Gleitman, L. R.|
|22nd Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society|
|[en] In 1995 Christenfeld and Hill published a paper that purported to show at one year of age, infants resemble their fathers more than their mothers. Evolution, they argued, would have produced this result since it would ensure male parental resources, since the paternity of the infant would no longer be in doubt. We believe this result is false. We present the results of two experiments (and mention a third) which are very far from replicating Christenfeld and Hill's data. In addition, we provide an evolutionary explanation as to why evolution would not have favored the result reported by Christenfeld and Hill.|
|Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives et Comportementales|
|Researchers ; Students|
There is no file associated with this reference.
All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.