Article (Scientific journals)
Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: a European survey of medical and paramedical professionals.
Demertzi, Athina; Schnakers, Caroline; Ledoux, Didier et al.
2009In Progress in Brain Research, 177, p. 329-38
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
demertzi_PBR_coma_science_2009.pdf
Publisher postprint (313.23 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Pain management in severely brain-damaged patients constitutes a clinical and ethical stake. At the bedside, assessing the presence of pain and suffering is challenging due to both patients' physical condition and inherent limitations of clinical assessment. Neuroimaging studies support the existence of distinct cerebral responses to noxious stimulation in brain death, vegetative state, and minimally conscious state. We here provide results from a European survey on 2059 medical and paramedical professionals' beliefs on possible pain perception in patients with disorders of consciousness. To the question "Do you think that patients in a vegetative state can feel pain?," 68% of the interviewed paramedical caregivers (n=538) and 56% of medical doctors (n=1166) answered "yes" (no data on exact profession in 17% of total sample). Logistic regression analysis showed that paramedical professionals, religious caregivers, and older caregivers reported more often that vegetative patients may experience pain. Following professional background, religion was the highest predictor of caregivers' opinion: 64% of religious (n=1009; 850 Christians) versus 52% of nonreligious respondents (n=830) answered positively (missing data on religion in 11% of total sample). To the question "Do you think that patients in a minimally conscious state can feel pain?" nearly all interviewed caregivers answered "yes" (96% of the medical doctors and 97% of the paramedical caregivers). Women and religious caregivers reported more often that minimally conscious patients may experience pain. These results are discussed in terms of existing definitions of pain and suffering, the remaining uncertainty on the clinical assessment of pain as a subjective first-person experience and recent functional neuroimaging findings on nociceptive processing in disorders of consciousness. In our view, more research is needed to increase our understanding of residual sensation in vegetative and minimally conscious patients and to propose evidence-based medical guidelines for the management of possible pain perception and suffering in these vulnerable patient populations.
Disciplines :
Neurology
Author, co-author :
Demertzi, Athina  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Coma Group > Centre de recherches du cyclotron
Schnakers, Caroline ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Coma Group > Centre de recherches du cyclotron
Ledoux, Didier  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Soins intensifs
Chatelle, Camille ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Centre de recherches du cyclotron
Bruno, Marie-Aurélie ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Coma Group > Centre de recherches du cyclotron
Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Coma Group > Centre de recherches du cyclotron
Boly, Mélanie ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Neurologie
Moonen, Gustave  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Neurologie Sart Tilman
Laureys, Steven  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Coma Group > Centre de recherches du cyclotron - Département des sciences cliniques
Language :
English
Title :
Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: a European survey of medical and paramedical professionals.
Publication date :
2009
Journal title :
Progress in Brain Research
ISSN :
0079-6123
eISSN :
1875-7855
Publisher :
Elsevier, Netherlands
Volume :
177
Pages :
329-38
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]
DISCOS
Available on ORBi :
since 19 February 2010

Statistics


Number of views
103 (15 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
4 (3 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
77
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
37
OpenCitations
 
62

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi