Paper published in a book (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
A comparison of Nash equilibria analysis and agent-based modelling for power markets
Krause, Thilo; Andersson, Goran; Ernst, Damien et al.
2005In Proceedings of the 15th Power System Computation Conference (PSCC 2005)
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
fp258.pdf
Publisher postprint (243.97 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
electricity markets modeling; multi-agent modeling; game theory; matrix games; reinforcement learning; spot markets
Abstract :
[en] In this paper we compare Nash equilibria analysis and agent-based modelling for assessing the market dynamics of network-constrained pool markets. Power suppliers submit their bids to the market place in order to maximize their payoffs, where we apply reinforcement learning as a behavioral agent model. The market clearing mechanism is based on the locational marginal pricing scheme. Simulations are carried out on a benchmark power system.We show how the evolution of the agent-based approach relates to the existence of a unique Nash equilibrium or multiple equilibria in the system. Additionally, the parameter sensitivity of the results is discussed.
Disciplines :
Electrical & electronics engineering
Author, co-author :
Krause, Thilo
Andersson, Goran
Ernst, Damien  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Dép. d'électric., électron. et informat. (Inst.Montefiore) > Systèmes et modélisation
Vdovina-Beck, Elena
Cherkaoui, Rachid
Germond, Alain
Language :
English
Title :
A comparison of Nash equilibria analysis and agent-based modelling for power markets
Publication date :
2005
Event name :
15th Power System Computation Conference (PSCC 2005)
Event place :
Liège, Belgium
Event date :
22-26 August 2005
Audience :
International
Main work title :
Proceedings of the 15th Power System Computation Conference (PSCC 2005)
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Funders :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]
Available on ORBi :
since 27 May 2009

Statistics


Number of views
50 (3 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1381 (149 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
12
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
11

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi