Reference : Grazing by large river zooplankton: a key to summer potamoplankton decline? The case of ...
Scientific journals : Article
Life sciences : Environmental sciences & ecology
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/132318
Grazing by large river zooplankton: a key to summer potamoplankton decline? The case of the Meuse and Moselle rivers in 1994 and 1995
English
Gosselain, Véronique []
Descy, Jean-Pierre []
Viroux, Laurent []
Joaquim-Justo, Célia mailto [Université de Liège - ULg > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Ecologie animale et écotoxicologie >]
Hammer, Astrid []
Métens, Arnaud []
Schweitzer, Sabine []
1998
Hydrobiologia
Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
0018-8158
[en] To explain summer declines in phytoplankton biomass in large rivers, we compared the effect of zooplankton grazing on the planktonic algae of two large European rivers, the Meuse and the Moselle. In situ grazing was measured during two years (1994 and 1995), using the Haney method. Total zooplankton community filtration rates recorded in the river Meuse ranged between 1 and 32% of the water volume filtered per day. A drastic algal decline was observed early July both years and may be explained by high densities of a rotiferdominated zooplankton community (500–700 ind. l􀀀1) with more than 75%of Brachionus calyciflorus. During the summer period in 1994, when grazingwas over 20%, edible algal biomasswas controlled by a diversified rotifer community (up to 2500 ind.l􀀀1), while a nonedible algal assemblage developed. In contrast, phytoplankton biomass remained comparatively lowin the Moselle throughout the lowflowperiod, as did zooplankton numbers duringmost of this time (fewer than 200 ind. l􀀀1 during the summer period). The proportion of crustaceans in this zooplanktonwas rather higher than in the Meuse, and they dominated at times, in biomass as well as in numbers. Nevertheless, measured in situ grazing rates (1–15%) could not explain the low summer algal biomass, even if low filtration rates may at times represent a significant carbon loss for phytoplankton, when and where net algal production was low. As a conclusion, the role of phytoplankton – zooplankton interactions in controlling algal biomass in large rivers is discussed.
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/132318

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
H369.pdfPublisher postprint590.36 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.