[en] Glick and Fiske's (1996) Ambivalent Sexism Inventory is a measure of hostile sexism (sexist antipathy) and benevolent sexism (a subjectively positive attitude toward women). This paper proposes a French version of this scale, the Echelle de Sexisme Ambivalent (ESA). Three studies on more than 1000 participants established the validity of this new scale. The first one is the application of Rasch's extended model that confirmed the psychometrical qualities of the ESA, for both male and female participants. The second study established the structural and predictive validity in a covariance analysis. This study again showed that both male and female participants displayed the same structural pattern. Next, both discriminant and convergent validity were assessed, by comparison to the Neosexism Scale (Tougas, Brown, Beaton and Joly, 1995) and the Social Dominance Scale (Sidanius and Pratto, 1999). Finally, practical and theoretical implications are discussed.
Research center :
Center for Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience
Disciplines :
Social, industrial & organizational psychology
Author, co-author :
Dardenne, Benoît ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Psychologie sociale
Delacollette, Nathalie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Psychologie sociale
Grégoire, Christine
Lecocq, Delphine
Language :
French
Title :
Latent structure of the French Validation of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Echelle de Sexisme Ambivalent
Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B. & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125.
Adams, R. J. & Khoo, S.-T. (1993). Quest : The Interactive Test Analysis System. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading (MA) : Addison-Wesley.
Benokraitis, N. V. (1997). Subtile sexism. Current pratices and prospects for change. Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage.
Bollen K., A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Browne, M. W. & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen et J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation Models. Sage Publications.
Carmines, E. & Mciver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. Bohrnstedt et E. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement : Current issues. Beverly Hills (CA) : Sage.
De Meyer, T., Ceulemans, E. & Meulders, D. (1999). Ségrégation sexuelle sur le marché de l'emploi en Belgique. Bruxelles (Belgique) : Ministère fédéral de l'Emploi et du Travail, Direction de l'égalité des chances.
Dardenne, B. (2000). Réflexions sur les actions de remédiation en politique : les quotas de femmes. Réflexions, 42, 24-29.
Dardenne, B., Bollier, T. & Dumont, M. (2006). Manuscrit en préparation.
Dardenne, B., Liegeois, A., & Bollier T. (2003). Is benevolent sexism an effective way to decrease women objective performance? XXIth Meeting of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology (communication à Lisbone, Portugal).
Eagly, A. H. & Mladinic, A. (1993). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence In W. Stroebe et M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 5, New York: Wiley.
Ford, T. E., Wentzel, E. R. & Lorion, J. (2001). Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 677-691. Fox, C. M. & Jones, J. A. (1998). Uses of Rasch modeling in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 30-45.
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., &Zhu L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating between hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2001a). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances of experimental social psychology, Vol. 33. San Diego (CA) : Academic Press.
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2001b). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. In J. T. Jost et B. Major (Eds.)
The psychology of legitimacy. Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge (UK) : Cambridge University Press.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy : Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
Guttentag, M. & Secord, P. (1983). Too many women? Beverly Hills (CA) : Sage.
Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanation on affect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13, 219-236.
Hoyle, R. H. & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Edit.), Structural equation models. Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage.
Jackman, M. (1994). The Velvet Glove : Paternalism and conflict in gender, class and race relations. Berkeley (CA) : University of California Press.
John, O. P. & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement : reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis et C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge (UK) : Cambridge University Press. Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale (NJ) : Erlbaum.
Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8. Chicago (IL) : Scientific Software International.
Jost, J. T. & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false-consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
Jost, J. T. & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. In W. Stroebe et M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 13. New York: Psychology Press.
Jost, J. T. & Major, B. (Eds.) (2001). The psychology of legitimacy. Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge (UK) : Cambridge University Press.
Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O.&Sullivan, B. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.
Jost, J. T. & Thompson, E. (2000). Groupbased dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of selfesteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
Judd, C. M. (2000). Everyday data analysis in social psychology: Comparisons of linear models. In H. T. Reis et Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman. New York: Columbia University Press. King, J. & Bond, T. (1996). A Rasch analysis of a measure of computer anxiety. Journal of Educational Computing Reasearch, 14, 49-65.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Leyens, J.-P., Desert, M., Croizet, J.-C. & Darcis, C. (2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189-1199.
Mcconahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidion et S. L. Gardner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Orlando (FL) : Academic Press.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M.&Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 93-103.
Ridgeway, C. (1992). Gender, interaction, and inequality. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Rudman, L. A. & Heppen, J. B. (2003). Implicit romantic fantasies and women's interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1357-1370.
Rombough, S. & Ventimiglia, J. C. (1981). Sexism: A tridimensional phenomenon. Sex Roles, 7, 747-755.
Sakalli, U. N. & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. Journal of Sex Reasearch, 40, 296-302.
Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance : An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge (UK) : Cambridge University Press.
Steiger, J. H. (1989). EzPATH: Causal modeling. Evanston (IL) : SYSTAT.
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M.&Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
Vallerand, R. J. (1989). Vers une méthodologie de validation trans-culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques : implications pour la recherche en langue française. Psychologie Canadienne, 30, 662-680.
Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2003). Infrahumanization: Ambivalent sexism and the attribution of primary and secondary emotions to women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 492-499.
Waugh, R. F. & Adisson, P. A. (1998). A Rasch measurement model analysis of the Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 95-112.
Wright, B. D. (1996). Local dependency, correlations, and principal components. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10, 509-511.
Wright, B. D. & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago : MESA Press.
